Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:20:01 +0900
From: "haoda" <haoda@64translator.com>
Subject: [dhcptest:00086] Re: FIxedInvalidSIDoption
To: "'amit agarwal'" <amit_agarr@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: <dhcptest@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <200512290520.jBT5K9Bx060637@bahamas.64translator.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051229050102.5592.qmail@web8712.mail.in.yahoo.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00086

Hi, Mr. Amit,

Sorry, I think you have mistaked something I said.
Please let me explain it.
>Thanks for new scripts, even i had noted those problems 
>earlier thought of sending them to you but forgot.
I have fixed it in the patch to you actually, but I  have not 
updated the version of test tool. So Mr. Volz use the old version
to test.
As you know, because the limitation of whether a function is
supported by NUT, I can't see the "Pass" result of some 
scripts. Because of your help, I can find the problem in
the scripts. 
And please keep giving us your feedback.
Thanks you very much!


>I am facing problem in the following scripts:
>S_RFC3736_5.1_SLDHCPRelayreply.seq
>S_RFC3736_5.2_SLDHCPInterID.seq
>S_RFC3736_5.2_SLDHCPRelaySvr.seq
>In the above 3 scripts, i am facing the same problem, 
>here i get the relay forwards message with information 
>request message, i construct the relay reply message 
>properly and sent it to the unicast address 3ffe:501:ffff:100:200:ff:fe00:a4a4
Now I'm  checking the problems.
Sorry for your waitting!


Sincerely yours,
Haoda