Hi,
I think that this test specification is wrong.
It will be modified in next release.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
________________________________
From: Gayatri Bulla [mailto:gayatri.bulla@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:18 PM
To: Enokihara, Hideshi (Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com)
Cc: dhcptest@tahi.org
Subject: [dhcptest:00134] Re: Clarification needed for server
test case 120
Hi,
Sorry for late reply.. I was out of station...
I am attaching the logs for test case 120 of server...
PLz check the same and let me know what is wrong....
Actually that test case is comparing the request and reply
messages T1 and T2 values...
What i feel is.... the ADvertisement and reply messages should
have the same T1 and T2 values.. irrespective of what is sent in request
message...
Plz comment...
Thanks and regards,
Gayatri
On 11/20/06, Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com <
Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com
<mailto:Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com> > wrote:
Hi,
Could you send me the test log, please?
Thank you for your cooperation!
Best regards,
________________________________
From: Gayatri Bulla
[mailto:gayatri.bulla@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:09 PM
To: dhcptest@tahi.org
Subject: [dhcptest:00131] Clarification needed
for server test
case 120
Hi,
I have one more doubt with test case 120 for
server....
Here he expects the prefered and valid lifetimes
of request and
reply message to be same....
But why should the server send in reply message
the same life
times sent in request message,,, server wil assign the
lifetimes which
it has in its configuration file....
Because i cant make my server assign the lifetime
got in request
message to some test cases and life time in
configuration file to some
other test case....
Test case 130 expects the lifetimes to be set to
zero.. So i am
setting the lifetimes to zero in configuration file..
but in the script,
in the request message, it send lifetimes greater then
zero.... this
conflicts with the earlier test case...
Plz comment on this....
Regards,
Gayatri