Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:41:57 +0900
From: <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [dhcptest:00163] Re: DHCPv6 Client Test 3315 #70
To: <slangley@tadboise.com>
Cc: <dhcptest@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <0260031F55435342859BFB2CCA6773D81B898A23@EXCHANGE03.jp.ykgw.net>
In-Reply-To: <04654E52DE5D8D47906217E3D32FA976073C55@sbserver.tadboise.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00163

Hello Scott,

Thankyou for your report.
 
>The reason it shouldn't have passed was that the Client's REPLY message
still specified an address in its IA_NA option when the test case says
it shouldn't do so after receiving a NotOnLink from the server.

"Client's REPLY message"should be "Client's Request message", right?

Anyway, I couldn't understand the reason why the issue occurred.
Could you send us (dhcptest@thai.org or contact@tahi.org) the
Logs(70.html and 70.html.Link0.dump)

Best regards,
...Hideshi
________________________________

	From: Scott Langley [mailto:slangley@tadboise.com] 
	Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:18 AM
	To: dhcptest@tahi.org
	Subject: [dhcptest:00162] DHCPv6 Client Test 3315 #70
	
	

	Here's a bit of feedback ...
	
	With the Release-1.0.0B1 of DHCPv6 Test Suite, I got a pass on
test #70 of section 3315 when I should not have.
	
	#70 Part C: Reply message contains NotOnLink in response to a
Request message.
	
	The reason it shouldn't have passed was that the Client's REPLY
message still specified an address in its IA_NA option when the test
case says it shouldn't do so after receiving a NotOnLink from the
server.
	
	Regards,
	
	Scott Langley
	slangley@tadboise.com