Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:06:27 +0900
From: Hiroshi MIYATA <miyata@tahi.org>
Subject: [dhcptest:00234] Re: DHCPv6 Test case #27
To: dhcptest@tahi.org
Message-Id: <1B6B4333-3CE9-47CF-B0C1-B2DE7C35904F@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071002213720.D6A6.TAKE@mol.konicaminolta.jp>
References: <20071002213720.D6A6.TAKE@mol.konicaminolta.jp>
X-Mail-Count: 00234

Takeuchi-san,

Which version are you using?

Could you please attach the test log file  27.html if possible?

Thanks,

....miyata

On 2007/10/02, at 21:51, Yasuji Takeuchi wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We had a strange result on testing RFC3315 Test case #27.
>
> TAHI has failed because of the invalid interval time.
> (See the log below.)
> ---------------------------------
> pkt count is  11
> elapsed-time = 3.19
> interval = 2.37442898750305
> elapsed-time field is incorrect
> NG
> DHCPv6 Client stop
> ---------------------------------
>
> But the network trace says that the NUT had sent the packet
> with the valid interval.
> The interval time I can see from the network trace is 3.199714899sec.
>
> I'm wondering if there's a countermeasure....
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Yasuji 'Sam' Takeuchi
>    take@mol.konicaminolta.jp
> <#27.enc>
> <logs.txt>