Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:44:56 +0900
From: Hiroshi MIYATA <miyata@tahi.org>
Subject: [dhcptest:00239] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questions outstanding
To: dhcptest@tahi.org
Message-Id: <50F72551-DA3E-4EFD-A71F-247791C5E305@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5CE6F3E1-682C-4161-B43D-4D2EA377696B@tahi.org>
References: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F805AEFF@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com> <5CE6F3E1-682C-4161-B43D-4D2EA377696B@tahi.org>
X-Mail-Count: 00239

Hi Tammy and all,

Thanks for your patient.
I modified the test scripts.
Could you please try it?

http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz

NOTE:
It includes all test scripts, but I mainly modified the test scripts
for Client regarding RFC3315.

I appreciate your feedback.

Thanks,

.....miyata

On 2007/10/17, at 22:24, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:

> Hi Tammy,
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
> I will send some update in a couple of days, hopefully. ;-)
>
> .....miyata
>
> On 2007/10/16, at 22:10, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>
>> Miyata,
>>
>> It is hard to say what has been improved, because the tests I  
>> reported
>> errors with are now showing other errors.  Test #15 has been fixed
>> though.  I will be happy to retest when you fix the .pm file.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tammy
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:22 AM
>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>> Subject: [dhcptest:00233] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite  
>> questions
>> outstanding
>>
>>
>> Hi Tammy,
>>
>> Thanks for your patience.
>> As I examined, the file DHCPv6_common.pm causes many problems.
>>
>> I think previous version works better.
>> I will fix it.
>>
>> So, could you please tell me which test was improved with new  
>> version?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> ....miyata
>>
>>
>> On 2007/10/10, at 22:13, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Last Friday I sent three errors that I found in the 1.0.7 version
>>> of the DHCPv6 self-test.  Can someone please let me know whether
>>> these issues are being looked into?
>>>
>>> They were regarding:
>>>
>>> 1 - MRD errors with tests #47 and #51
>>>
>>> 2 - RT errors with tests #46 and #50
>>>
>>> 3 - Time out error with test #42
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Tammy Leino
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>