Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:38:19 -0700 From: "Leino, Tammy" <tammy_leino@mentor.com> Subject: [dhcptest:00241] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questions outstanding To: <dhcptest@tahi.org> Message-Id: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F805AFF8@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com> In-Reply-To: <50F72551-DA3E-4EFD-A71F-247791C5E305@tahi.org> X-Mail-Count: 00241Miyata,Thank you very much for your work on fixing the scripts. I havefinished testing the new scripts. I have only one failure, but it doesnot relate to the other failures I reported. All other tests areoperating properly.My one failing test is #34. The verification points for this test areas follows: If the client does not receive any Advertise messages before the first RT has elapsed, it begins the retransmission. The client terminates the retransmission process as soon as it receives any Advertise message, and the client acts on the received Advertise message without waiting for any additional Advertise messages.My test is following the verification points, but the script reports itas failing. NUT sends first SOLICIT, then retransmits with secondSOLICIT. TAHI node sends ADVERTISE message and NUT responds withREQUEST. The script now reports that RT != IRT + RAND*IRT. I haveattached 34.html for your reference. Can you please explain the changethat was made to this script and why it is now failing.I appreciate all your work and diligence on this project.Best Regards,Tammy Leino-----Original Message-----From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:45 AMTo: dhcptest@tahi.orgSubject: [dhcptest:00239] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questionsoutstandingHi Tammy and all,Thanks for your patient.I modified the test scripts.Could you please try it?http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgzNOTE:It includes all test scripts, but I mainly modified the test scriptsfor Client regarding RFC3315.I appreciate your feedback.Thanks,.....miyataOn 2007/10/17, at 22:24, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:> Hi Tammy,>> Thanks for your understanding.> I will send some update in a couple of days, hopefully. ;-)>> .....miyata>> On 2007/10/16, at 22:10, Leino, Tammy wrote:>>> Miyata,>>>> It is hard to say what has been improved, because the tests I >> reported>> errors with are now showing other errors. Test #15 has been fixed>> though. I will be happy to retest when you fix the .pm file.>>>> Thanks,>> Tammy>>>>>> -----Original Message----->> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:22 AM>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org>> Subject: [dhcptest:00233] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite >> questions>> outstanding>>>>>> Hi Tammy,>>>> Thanks for your patience.>> As I examined, the file DHCPv6_common.pm causes many problems.>>>> I think previous version works better.>> I will fix it.>>>> So, could you please tell me which test was improved with new >> version?>>>> Best Regards,>>>> ....miyata>>>>>> On 2007/10/10, at 22:13, Leino, Tammy wrote:>>>>> Hello All,>>>>>> Last Friday I sent three errors that I found in the 1.0.7 version>>> of the DHCPv6 self-test. Can someone please let me know whether>>> these issues are being looked into?>>>>>> They were regarding:>>>>>> 1 - MRD errors with tests #47 and #51>>>>>> 2 - RT errors with tests #46 and #50>>>>>> 3 - Time out error with test #42>>>>>> Best Regards,>>> Tammy Leino>>>>>>>>>>>>>241_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)