Hi Tammy,
Thanks for your kind report.
I will confirm it soon.
Thanks,
....miyata
On 2007/11/08, at 5:38, Leino, Tammy wrote:
> Miyata,
>
> Thank you very much for your work on fixing the scripts. I have
> finished testing the new scripts. I have only one failure, but it
> does
> not relate to the other failures I reported. All other tests are
> operating properly.
>
> My one failing test is #34. The verification points for this test are
> as follows:
>
> If the client does not receive any Advertise messages before the
> first RT has elapsed, it begins the retransmission. The client
> terminates the retransmission process as soon as it receives any
> Advertise message, and the client acts on the received Advertise
> message without waiting for any additional Advertise messages.
>
> My test is following the verification points, but the script
> reports it
> as failing. NUT sends first SOLICIT, then retransmits with second
> SOLICIT. TAHI node sends ADVERTISE message and NUT responds with
> REQUEST. The script now reports that RT != IRT + RAND*IRT. I have
> attached 34.html for your reference. Can you please explain the
> change
> that was made to this script and why it is now failing.
>
> I appreciate all your work and diligence on this project.
>
> Best Regards,
> Tammy Leino
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:45 AM
> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
> Subject: [dhcptest:00239] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questions
> outstanding
>
>
> Hi Tammy and all,
>
> Thanks for your patient.
> I modified the test scripts.
> Could you please try it?
>
> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz
>
> NOTE:
> It includes all test scripts, but I mainly modified the test scripts
> for Client regarding RFC3315.
>
> I appreciate your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> .....miyata
>
> On 2007/10/17, at 22:24, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>
>> Hi Tammy,
>>
>> Thanks for your understanding.
>> I will send some update in a couple of days, hopefully. ;-)
>>
>> .....miyata
>>
>> On 2007/10/16, at 22:10, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>
>>> Miyata,
>>>
>>> It is hard to say what has been improved, because the tests I
>>> reported
>>> errors with are now showing other errors. Test #15 has been fixed
>>> though. I will be happy to retest when you fix the .pm file.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tammy
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:22 AM
>>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>>> Subject: [dhcptest:00233] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>>> questions
>>> outstanding
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patience.
>>> As I examined, the file DHCPv6_common.pm causes many problems.
>>>
>>> I think previous version works better.
>>> I will fix it.
>>>
>>> So, could you please tell me which test was improved with new
>>> version?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> ....miyata
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2007/10/10, at 22:13, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> Last Friday I sent three errors that I found in the 1.0.7 version
>>>> of the DHCPv6 self-test. Can someone please let me know whether
>>>> these issues are being looked into?
>>>>
>>>> They were regarding:
>>>>
>>>> 1 - MRD errors with tests #47 and #51
>>>>
>>>> 2 - RT errors with tests #46 and #50
>>>>
>>>> 3 - Time out error with test #42
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Tammy Leino
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> <34.html>