Hi Tammy,
I apologize, I taught you previous URL.
Correct one is
http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b2.tgz
Please try it again.
Thanks so a lot!
...miyata
On 2007/11/10, at 0:12, Leino, Tammy wrote:
> Miyata,
>
> I see the same problem with test #34. Please advise.
>
> Best Regards,
> Tammy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:47 PM
> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
> Subject: [dhcptest:00243] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questions
> outstanding
>
>
> Hi Tammy,
>
> Could you please try this package?
>
> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz
>
> It was my bug. Now it should work correctly.
>
>
> Thanks for your cooperation!
>
> ....miyata
>
> On 2007/11/08, at 13:19, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>
>> Hi Tammy,
>>
>> Thanks for your kind report.
>> I will confirm it soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ....miyata
>>
>> On 2007/11/08, at 5:38, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>
>>> Miyata,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your work on fixing the scripts. I have
>>> finished testing the new scripts. I have only one failure, but it
>>> does
>>> not relate to the other failures I reported. All other tests are
>>> operating properly.
>>>
>>> My one failing test is #34. The verification points for this test
>>> are
>>> as follows:
>>>
>>> If the client does not receive any Advertise messages before the
>>> first RT has elapsed, it begins the retransmission. The client
>>> terminates the retransmission process as soon as it receives any
>>> Advertise message, and the client acts on the received Advertise
>>> message without waiting for any additional Advertise messages.
>>>
>>> My test is following the verification points, but the script
>>> reports it
>>> as failing. NUT sends first SOLICIT, then retransmits with second
>>> SOLICIT. TAHI node sends ADVERTISE message and NUT responds with
>>> REQUEST. The script now reports that RT != IRT + RAND*IRT. I have
>>> attached 34.html for your reference. Can you please explain the
>>> change
>>> that was made to this script and why it is now failing.
>>>
>>> I appreciate all your work and diligence on this project.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Tammy Leino
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:45 AM
>>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>>> Subject: [dhcptest:00239] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>>> questions
>>> outstanding
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tammy and all,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patient.
>>> I modified the test scripts.
>>> Could you please try it?
>>>
>>> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz
>>>
>>> NOTE:
>>> It includes all test scripts, but I mainly modified the test scripts
>>> for Client regarding RFC3315.
>>>
>>> I appreciate your feedback.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> .....miyata
>>>
>>> On 2007/10/17, at 22:24, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your understanding.
>>>> I will send some update in a couple of days, hopefully. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> .....miyata
>>>>
>>>> On 2007/10/16, at 22:10, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Miyata,
>>>>>
>>>>> It is hard to say what has been improved, because the tests I
>>>>> reported
>>>>> errors with are now showing other errors. Test #15 has been fixed
>>>>> though. I will be happy to retest when you fix the .pm file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tammy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:22 AM
>>>>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>>>>> Subject: [dhcptest:00233] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>>>>> questions
>>>>> outstanding
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your patience.
>>>>> As I examined, the file DHCPv6_common.pm causes many problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think previous version works better.
>>>>> I will fix it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, could you please tell me which test was improved with new
>>>>> version?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> ....miyata
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2007/10/10, at 22:13, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last Friday I sent three errors that I found in the 1.0.7 version
>>>>>> of the DHCPv6 self-test. Can someone please let me know whether
>>>>>> these issues are being looked into?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They were regarding:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 - MRD errors with tests #47 and #51
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 - RT errors with tests #46 and #50
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 - Time out error with test #42
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Tammy Leino
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <34.html>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>