Tammy,
Thanks for your report.
I modified DHCP_common.pm to add new function.
But it affect only test 34 at this moment.
So confirming only 34 is fine.
Thanks again.
....miyata
On 2007/11/13, at 6:03, Leino, Tammy wrote:
> Miyata,
>
> Test #34 is successful. I did not execute the entire test suite
> because
> it takes 6 hours to finish. Is #34 the only change you made in this
> version of the suite? Do I need to run the entire suite to ensure
> everything is working properly?
>
> I ran the entire suite of the previous version, so if you changed only
> test #34, I think we are ok.
>
> Best Regards,
> Tammy Leino
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 6:54 PM
> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
> Subject: [dhcptest:00245] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite questions
> outstanding
>
>
> Hi Tammy,
>
> I apologize, I taught you previous URL.
>
> Correct one is
> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b2.tgz
>
> Please try it again.
>
> Thanks so a lot!
>
> ...miyata
>
> On 2007/11/10, at 0:12, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>
>> Miyata,
>>
>> I see the same problem with test #34. Please advise.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Tammy
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:47 PM
>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>> Subject: [dhcptest:00243] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>> questions
>> outstanding
>>
>>
>> Hi Tammy,
>>
>> Could you please try this package?
>>
>> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz
>>
>> It was my bug. Now it should work correctly.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your cooperation!
>>
>> ....miyata
>>
>> On 2007/11/08, at 13:19, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your kind report.
>>> I will confirm it soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> ....miyata
>>>
>>> On 2007/11/08, at 5:38, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Miyata,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your work on fixing the scripts. I have
>>>> finished testing the new scripts. I have only one failure, but it
>>>> does
>>>> not relate to the other failures I reported. All other tests are
>>>> operating properly.
>>>>
>>>> My one failing test is #34. The verification points for this test
>>>> are
>>>> as follows:
>>>>
>>>> If the client does not receive any Advertise messages before the
>>>> first RT has elapsed, it begins the retransmission. The client
>>>> terminates the retransmission process as soon as it receives any
>>>> Advertise message, and the client acts on the received Advertise
>>>> message without waiting for any additional Advertise messages.
>>>>
>>>> My test is following the verification points, but the script
>>>> reports it
>>>> as failing. NUT sends first SOLICIT, then retransmits with second
>>>> SOLICIT. TAHI node sends ADVERTISE message and NUT responds with
>>>> REQUEST. The script now reports that RT != IRT + RAND*IRT. I have
>>>> attached 34.html for your reference. Can you please explain the
>>>> change
>>>> that was made to this script and why it is now failing.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate all your work and diligence on this project.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Tammy Leino
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:45 AM
>>>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>>>> Subject: [dhcptest:00239] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>>>> questions
>>>> outstanding
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tammy and all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patient.
>>>> I modified the test scripts.
>>>> Could you please try it?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.tahi.org/logo/dhcpv6/script/dhcpv6.p2.108b1.tgz
>>>>
>>>> NOTE:
>>>> It includes all test scripts, but I mainly modified the test
>>>> scripts
>>>> for Client regarding RFC3315.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> .....miyata
>>>>
>>>> On 2007/10/17, at 22:24, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your understanding.
>>>>> I will send some update in a couple of days, hopefully. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> .....miyata
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2007/10/16, at 22:10, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Miyata,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is hard to say what has been improved, because the tests I
>>>>>> reported
>>>>>> errors with are now showing other errors. Test #15 has been
>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>> though. I will be happy to retest when you fix the .pm file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Tammy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Hiroshi MIYATA [mailto:miyata@tahi.org]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:22 AM
>>>>>> To: dhcptest@tahi.org
>>>>>> Subject: [dhcptest:00233] Re: Recent DHCPv6 1.0.7 test suite
>>>>>> questions
>>>>>> outstanding
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tammy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your patience.
>>>>>> As I examined, the file DHCPv6_common.pm causes many problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think previous version works better.
>>>>>> I will fix it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, could you please tell me which test was improved with new
>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ....miyata
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2007/10/10, at 22:13, Leino, Tammy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Last Friday I sent three errors that I found in the 1.0.7
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>> of the DHCPv6 self-test. Can someone please let me know whether
>>>>>>> these issues are being looked into?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They were regarding:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 - MRD errors with tests #47 and #51
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2 - RT errors with tests #46 and #50
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 - Time out error with test #42
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Tammy Leino
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <34.html>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>