Oops, I forgot to add dhcptest@tahi.org on CC:
.....miyata
On 2008/01/07, at 9:26, Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
> Hi Francis,
>
> Thanks for your report.
> I will check both points.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ....miyata
>
> On 2008/01/07, at 6:09, Francis Dupont wrote:
>
>> In DHCPv6_Self_Test_1-0 the file S_RFC3633_10_MultiIAPDOP.def
>> defines a
>> Solicit with an extra ServerID:
>>
>> FEM_dhcp6_solicit(
>> solicit_client1_to_alldhcp_muliapd,
>> _HETHER_client1_to_alldhcp,
>> {
>> _SRC(CLIENT1_LLOCAL_UCAST);
>> _DST(v6(_ALLDHCPAGENTS_MCAST_ADDR));
>> HopLimit = 1;
>> },
>> {
>> _SPORT(546);
>> _DPORT(547);
>> },
>> {
>> option = opt_CID_LLT_client1;
>> option = opt_SID_LLT_server1; <---- here
>> option = opt_IA_MPD_1;
>> option = opt_IA_MPD_2;
>> Identifier = ID_SOL;
>> }
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
>>
>> PS: I believe the S_RFC3633_9_IAPD_SetT1T2to0.seq has a spurious
>> check
>> (last one):
>> # Because the time depends on the Client, so the lifetimes in
>> %rep4 & %req3 are same.
>> if (0 != CheckTimeOfPrefixOP(\%req3,\%rep4)){
>> dhcpExitError("<B>The values of lifetimes between Require & Reply
>> are not consitent</B>");
>>
>> as the req3 carries no IA PD Prefix I am afraid this check will
>> always fail.
>