Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:59:31 +0900 From: <Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com> Subject: [dhcptest:00288] Re: An issue in DHCPv6_common.pm for 1.0.9 To: <dhcptest@tahi.org> Message-Id: <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120C9ADC464@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net> In-Reply-To: <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120C9ADC3CA@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net> X-Mail-Count: 00288Hi, Chen. You are right. Update version will be soon released. thanks. ________________________________ From: Ozoe, Nobumichi (Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 1:36 PM To: dhcptest@tahi.org Subject: [dhcptest:00287] Re: An issue in DHCPv6_common.pm for 1.0.9 Hi, Chen Thanks your comment. I'll check it. ________________________________ From: Speedo Chen -$B3/+['J(B [mailto:Speedo.Chen@zyxel.com.tw] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:57 PM To: dhcptest@tahi.org Subject: [dhcptest:00286] Re: An issue in DHCPv6_common.pm for 1.0.9 Hi, Does someone have the same DUID-LL script issue as below? Or this one is not the issue basically? Could someone give me any idea? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Y.T. ________________________________ From: Speedo Chen -$B3/+['J(B [mailto:Speedo.Chen@zyxel.com.tw] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 7:10 PM To: dhcptest@tahi.org Subject: [dhcptest:00278] An issue in DHCPv6_common.pm for 1.0.9 Hi, I think there is an issue in DHCPv6_common.pm. line 1744 if((!defined($time)) && (3 == $duidtype)){ Since DUID-LL(type 3) has no time info. (not DUID-LLT, type 1) I think it should be changed as below if((!defined($time)) && (1 == $duidtype)){ BRs, Y.T.288_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)