Date: 29 Dec 2005 05:08:39 -0000 From: "PRAMENDRA SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> Subject: [dnstest:00041] Got a doubt regarding test case no. 33 To: "dnstest" <dnstest@tahi.org>, Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com Message-Id: <20051229050839.8820.qmail@webmail30.rediffmail.com> X-Mail-Count: 00041Hi in test case no. 33 (CL_RFC1034_5_3_3_cache_delegation) As per your= test sequence the NUT must cache the valid delegation... & also u said t=he target (NUT) should be capable of caching & recursive function... I'm =using bind9, where my resolver caches the response...but as per the 3rd =step of the test sequence, the NUT must send the query automatically to =the DNS Server2... But my question is in the second step when the TN s=ends back the response, it never sets RA (recursion available)...but my res=olver is sending RD=1, coz my DNS_MESSAGE_FLAG_MASK = 0x8ff0U... S=o the resolver can send query recursively...if it gets RA = 1 I thin=k this sounds logical... please comment....your comments are always va=luable for me.. thanks & regards Prem41_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)