<P>
<BR>
Hi<BR>
<BR>
In test case 33(CL_RFC1034_5_3_3_cache_=
delegation - Analyze the response(caching delegation)), <BR>
the TN sends=
a delegation in the 2nd step, where in the authority<BR>
section we get =
the referal of NS2.example.com. & in the additional section we ge=
t the IP address for this NS2.example.com.<BR>
<BR>
But in realty in th=
e additional section it comes as NS2.NS2.example.com. the NAME contents,<BR=
>
I checked it like, not providing the client caching functionality..<BR>=
I mean I dint run the caching server locally...just like normal test cas=
es where we donot need the caching functionality...<BR>
<BR>
executed t=
he query like this dig A.example.com. (no caching)<BR>=
then I got answer section empty, authority section (NSDNAME) contains NS=
2.example.com but the additional section (NAME) contains NS2.NS2.exam=
ple.com<BR>
<BR>
As per my knowledge is concerned I know it should alwa=
ys be the same, I mean the NSDNAME (authority section) & NAME (addition=
al section) contents...also in RFC 1034 there are lots of examples<BR>
in=
the section 6.2 & onwards....where no where I found the dissimilarity.=
..<BR>
<BR>
the same happens in test case 32 also...<BR>
<BR>
pleas=
e let me know whether my analysis is right or wrong...<BR>
<BR>
expecti=
ng your comments....<BR>
<BR>
thanks & regrads<BR>
Prem<BR>
=
</P>
<br><br>
<a href="http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigc=
lick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3">=
<IMG SRC="http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigimpress.cgi/www.re=
diff.com/signature-home.htm/1963059423@Middle5?OAS_query=null&PARTNER=3=
" BORDER=0 VSPACE=0 HSPACE=0></a>