Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:48:14 +0900
From: Hideshi Enokihara <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [dnstest:00049] Re: test case no. 76 I need to confirm...
To: sanjib das <hungrypenguinn@gmail.com>
Cc: dnstest@tahi.org, sanjeev_ddas@rediffmail.com, contact@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20060105134814.2913b56b.Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a9fad400512292301v2cbc3097o3f0b3213c288c4c8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7a9fad400512292301v2cbc3097o3f0b3213c288c4c8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00049

Hi Sanjib and happy new year!

Sorry for my delay response.
I had taken the vacation for a few days.

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:31:54 +0530
sanjib das <hungrypenguinn@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
> Mr. Hideshi
> 
> 
> In test case 76 (CL_RFC1035_7_4_cache_RRs - Caching several RRs of same
> type)
> As per the verification point
> When several RRs of the same type are available for a particular owner name,
> the resolver should either cache them all or none at all.
> & also in the  judgement even if the NUT does not send 3rd & 4th packets the
> test case should get passed..
> coz in my case the resolver is caching the information..so it wont send
> again the query...
> 
> But the test script says FAILED if it does not get 3rd & 4th packet...
> is it something wrong with the script...?

I think that maybe test script have some bugs.
Please send us(contact@tahi.org) the test log and test script that you used.
I want to check the test script.

Best Regards,

> expecting your comment on this...
> 
> thanks & regards
> 
> Sanjib
> 


-- 
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation