Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:12:36 +0900
From: Hideshi Enokihara <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [dnstest:00053] Re: got a doubt regarding test case no. 76
To: "PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com>
Cc: dnstest@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20060105141236.7556118a.Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060102113401.16583.qmail@webmail31.rediffmail.com>
References: <20060102113401.16583.qmail@webmail31.rediffmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00053

Hi Prem,

Is this question same as "Subject: [dnstest:00043] need a help regarding test case 76", right?

We'll be waiting for your test log.

Best Regards,

On 2 Jan 2006 11:34:01 -0000
"PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> wrote:

>  __> Hi all
> 
> 
> In test case 76 (CL_RFC1035_7_4_cache_RRs - Caching several RRs of same type)
> As per the verification point 
> When several RRs of the same type are available for a particular owner name, the resolver should either cache them all or none at all. 
> & also in the  judgement even if the NUT does not send 3rd & 4th packets the test case should get passed..
> coz in my case the resolver is caching the information..so it wont send again the query...
> 
> But the test script says FAILED if it does not get 3rd & 4th packet...
> is it something wrong with the script...?
> 
> expecting your comment on this...
> 
> thanks & regards
> 
> Prem 
> 
> 


-- 
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation