NAME

  I_RFC2408_3_5_1_P2_NP_0 - [Initiator Test] Proposal Payload format check format check(Phase II)


TARGET

  End-Node


SYNOPSIS

  I_RFC2408_3_5_1_P2_NP_0.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt I_RFC2408_3_5_1_P2_NP_0.def -tooloption : v6eval tool option
  See also ike_common.def and ike_ipsec.def and ike_addr.def and ike_pkt_ph1_recv.def and ike_pkt_ph2_recv.def


INITIALIZATION


TEST PROCEDURE

  This test check is following.

* PHASE I
Either IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE or AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE is performed as a pre sequence.

IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE
# Initiator(NUT) Direction Responder(TN) (1) HDR; SA ========>
(2) <======== HDR; SA
(3) HDR; KE; NONCE ========>
(4) <======== HDR; KE; NONCE
(5) HDR*; IDii; HASH_I ========>
(6) <======== HDR*; IDir; HASH_R
1. Receive the first message from NUT In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
2. Send the second message from TN In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads.
3. Receive the third message from NUT In the third (3) message, the initiator send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
4. Send the fourth message from TN In the fourth (4) message, the responder send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
5. Receive the fifth message from NUT In the fifth (5) message, the initiator send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
6. Send the sixth message from TN In the sixth (6) message, the responder send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).

AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE
# Initiator(NUT) Direction Responder(TN) NOTE (1) HDR; SA; KE; => Begin ISAKMP-SA or Proxy negotiation NONCE; IDii and Key Exchange
(2) <= HDR; SA; KE; NONCE; IDir; AUTH Initiator Identity Verified by Responder Key Generated Basic SA agreed upon
(3) HDR*; AUTH => Responder Identity Verified by Initiator SA established
1. Recieve the first message from NUT In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). There can be only one Proposal and one Transform offered (i.e. no choices) in order for the aggressive exchange to work. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks are also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the initiator transmits identification information.
2. Send the second message from TN In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks is also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the responder transmits identification information. All of this information is transmitted under the protection of the agreed upon authentication function. Local security policy dictates the action of the responder if no proposed protection suite is accepted. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.
3. Recieve the third message from NUT In the third (3) message, the initiator transmits the results of the agreed upon authentication function. This information is transmitted under the protection of the common shared secret. Local security policy dictates the action if an error occurs during these messages. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.

The test sequence is following.
* PHASE II
QUICK MODE
# Initiator(NUT) Direction Responder(TN) (1) HDR*, HASH(1), SA, Ni ========> Judgement (Check *1)
1. Receive the first message from NUT In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). And initiator send HASH(1) and Nonce. HASH(1) is the prf over the message id (M-ID) from the ISAKMP header concatenated with the entire message that follows the hash including all payload headers, but excluding any padding added for encryption. Nonce is random information which is used to guarantee liveness.


JUDGEMENT

        In Phase I , messages must be exchanged correctly.
        In Phase II , the first message's Proposal Payload Format must be base 
        on description of RFC(see above Verification Points).


TERMINATION

  Clean up SAD and SPD


REFERENCE

  RFC2408
  2.5.2 RESERVED Fields

The existence of RESERVED fields within ISAKMP payloads are used strictly to preserve byte alignment. All RESERVED fields in the ISAKMP protocol MUST be set to zero (0) when a packet is issued. The receiver SHOULD check the RESERVED fields for a zero (0) value and discard the packet if other values are found.
(omit)
3.5 Proposal Payload
(omit)
1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! Next Payload ! RESERVED ! Payload Length ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! Proposal # ! Protocol-Id ! SPI Size !# of Transforms! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! SPI (variable) ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
(omit)
o Next Payload (1 octet) - Identifier for the payload type of the next payload in the message. This field MUST only contain the value "2" or "0". If there are additional Proposal payloads in the message, then this field will be 2. If the current Proposal payload is the last within the security association proposal, then this field will be 0.
o RESERVED (1 octet) - Unused, set to 0.
o Payload Length (2 octets) - Length in octets of the entire Proposal payload, including generic payload header, the Proposal payload, and all Transform payloads associated with this proposal. In the event there are multiple proposals with the same proposal number (see section 4.2), the Payload Length field only applies to the current Proposal payload and not to all Proposal payloads.
o Proposal # (1 octet) - Identifies the Proposal number for the current payload. A description of the use of this field is found in section 4.2.
o Protocol-Id (1 octet) - Specifies the protocol identifier for the current negotiation. Examples might include IPSEC ESP, IPSEC AH, OSPF, TLS, etc.
o SPI Size (1 octet) - Length in octets of the SPI as defined by the Protocol-Id. In the case of ISAKMP, the Initiator and Responder cookie pair from the ISAKMP Header is the ISAKMP SPI, therefore, the SPI Size is irrelevant and MAY be from zero (0) to sixteen (16). If the SPI Size is non-zero, the content of the SPI field MUST be ignored. If the SPI Size is not a multiple of 4 octets it will have some impact on the SPI field and the alignment of all payloads in the message. The Domain of Interpretation (DOI) will dictate the SPI Size for other protocols.
o # of Transforms (1 octet) - Specifies the number of transforms for the Proposal. Each of these is contained in a Transform payload.
o SPI (variable) - The sending entity's SPI. In the event the SPI Size is not a multiple of 4 octets, there is no padding applied to the payload, however, it can be applied at the end of the message.
(omit)
5.3 Generic Payload Header Processing
When creating any of the ISAKMP Payloads described in sections 3.4 through 3.15 a Generic Payload Header is placed at the beginning of these payloads. When creating the Generic Payload Header, the transmitting entity (initiator or responder) MUST do the following:
1. Place the value of the Next Payload in the Next Payload field. These values are described in section 3.1.
2. Place the value zero (0) in the RESERVED field.
3. Place the length (in octets) of the payload in the Payload Length field.

4. Construct the payloads as defined in the remainder of this section.
(omit)
5.5 Proposal Payload Processing
When creating a Proposal Payload, the transmitting entity (initiator or responder) MUST do the following:
1. Determine the Protocol for this proposal.
2. Determine the number of proposals to be offered for this protocol and the number of transforms for each proposal. Transforms are described in section 3.6.
3. Generate a unique pseudo-random SPI.
4. Construct a Proposal payload.
(omit)


SEE ALSO

  perldoc V6evalTool
  IKE.html IKE Test Common Utility