NAME

  I_RFC2408_5_11_2_1_HASH - [Initiator Test] Check the Hash to confirm it is supported


TARGET

  End-Node


SYNOPSIS

  I_RFC2408_5_11_2_1_HASH.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt I_RFC2408_5_11_2_1_HASH.def -tooloption : v6eval tool option
  See also ike_common.def and ike_ipsec.def and ike_addr.def and ike_pkt_ph1_recv.def and ike_pkt_ph2_recv.def


INITIALIZATION


TEST PROCEDURE

  This test check is following.

IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE
(1) HDR; SA ========>
(2) <======== HDR; SA
(3) HDR; KE; NONCE ========>
(4) <======== HDR; KE; NONCE
(5) HDR*; IDii; HASH_I ========>
(6) <======== HDR*; IDir; HASH_R <----Hash Data field : not include this field (invalid)
(7) HDR*; HASH(1); N/D ========> <----must not start Phase II (HDR; N/D) Judgement (Check *1)
1. Receive the first message from NUT In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
2. Send the second message from TN In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads.
3. Receive the third message from NUT In the third (3) message, the initiator send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
4. Send the fourth message from TN In the fourth (4) message, the responder send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
5. Receive the fifth message from NUT In the fifth (5) message, the initiator send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
6. Send the sixth message from TN In the sixth (6) message, the responder send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
7. Receive the seventh message from NUT In the seventh message (7), the initiator indicates either an ISAKMP Notify Payload or an ISAKMP delete Payload.


JUDGEMENT

        The first to  the fifth message must be exchanged correctly.
        The sixth message must not be accepted. And the seventh message must not be returned (* or 
        INVALID-HASH-INFORMATION message is returned).(Not establish ISAKMP SA, 
        Not start negotiation of Phase II).
        *option : if you want to check the retruned Notify message.


TERMINATION

  Clean up SAD and SPD


REFERENCE

  RFC2408
  5.11 Hash Payload Processing

(omit)
When a Hash payload is received, the receiving entity (initiator or responder) MUST do the following:
1. Determine if the Hash is supported. If the Hash determination fails, the message is discarded and the following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID HASH INFORMATION, MAY be logged in the appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload containing the INVALID-HASH-INFORMATION message type MAY be sent to the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a system security policy.
2. Perform the Hash function as outlined in the DOI and/or Key Exchange protocol documents. If the Hash function fails, the message is discarded and the following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID HASH VALUE, MAY be logged in the appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload containing the AUTHENTICATION-FAILED message type MAY be sent to the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a system security policy.
(omit)


SEE ALSO

  perldoc V6evalTool
  IKE.html IKE Test Common Utility