");
#======================================================================
vStop($IF0);
ikeReset();
ikeExitPass();
#NOTREACHED
######################################################################
__END__
=head1 NAME
R_A_RFC2408_5_2_P1_1_HEADER - [Responder Test] Invalid Initiator Cookie
=head1 TARGET
End-Node
=head1 SYNOPSIS
=begin html
R_A_RFC2408_5_2_P1_1_HEADER.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt R_A_RFC2408_5_2_P1_1_HEADER.def -tooloption : v6eval tool option
See also ike_common.def and ike_ipsec.def and ike_addr.def and ike_pkt_ph1_recv.def and ike_pkt_ph2_recv.def
=end html
=head1 INITIALIZATION
=begin html
HOST-2(TN):initiator
|3ffe:501:ffff:101::11
|
Net-y --+--------+------------------------ 3ffe:501:ffff:101::/64
|
|
ROUTER-1(TN)
|3ffe:501:ffff:100::11
|
Net-z --+--------+------------------------ 3ffe:501:ffff:100::/64
|
|3ffe:501:ffff:100:XXXX
NUT:responder
XXXX: EUI64 address
Verification Points
Verify the Initiator and Responder "cookies". If the cookie
validation fails, the message is discarded and the following
actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID COOKIE, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-COOKIE message type MAY be sent to
the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a
system security policy.
Configuration
ISAKMP Header Format(HOST-2:Initiator)
In TEST PROCEDURE, Initiator Cookie field of the third message of
AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE is set to 0(not same the first message's
initiator cookie).
Initiator and Responder IKE parameter
At least, following parameter must be included in proposal.
| Machine |
Src |
Dest |
Phase I |
Phase II |
| Ex mode |
Key Value |
Enc Alg |
Hash Alg |
Auth Method |
DH Group |
PH1 Lt |
IDx |
Proto ID |
Trans ID |
Mode |
Auth Alg |
PH2 Lt |
Upper |
| NUT |
NUT addr |
HOST-2 addr |
Aggressive |
IKE-TEST |
3DES |
SHA |
pre-shared key |
2 |
8 Hour |
NUT addr |
PROTO_IPSEC_ESP |
ESP_3DES |
Transport |
HMAC-SHA |
8 Hour |
any |
| HOST-2 |
HOST-2 addr |
NUT addr |
Aggressive |
IKE-TEST |
3DES |
SHA |
pre-shared key |
2 |
8 Hour |
HOST-2 addr |
PROTO_IPSEC_ESP |
ESP_3DES |
Transport |
HMAC-SHA |
8 Hour |
any |
*Ex Mode = Exchange mode
*IDx = identity payload(FQDN or user FQDN can also be chosen as IDx)
*Enc Alg = IKE Encryption Algorithm
*Hash Alg = IKE Authentication Algorithm
*Key Value = pre-shared key value
*PH1 Lt = Phase-1 Lifetime
*PH2 Lt = Phase-2 Lifetime
*Proto ID = Protocol Identifier
*Trans ID = Transform Identifier
*Mode = Encapsulation Mode
*Auth Alg = Authentication Algorithm
*Auth Method = Authentication Method
*DH Group = Diffie-Hellman Group
*Upper = Upper Layer Protocol
*NUT addr = NUT address
*HOST-2 addr = HOST-2 address
=end html
=head1 TEST PROCEDURE
=begin html
This test check is following.
AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT)
(1) HDR; SA, KE, Ni, IDii ========>
(2) <======== HDR; SA, KE, Nr, IDir, HASH_R
(3) HDR[*]; HASH_I ========> <-----Cookie field : 0(invalid(not same as the first message(1)'s cookie))
(4) <======== HDR*; HASH(1); N/D
(HDR; N/D)
Judgement (Check *1)
1. Send the first message from TN
In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it
considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The
Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included
in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random
information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against
replay attacks are also transmitted. Additionally, the initiator
transmits identification information.
2. Receive the second message from NUT
In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection
suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and
Transform payloads.
Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random
information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against
replay attacks is also transmitted.Additionally, the responder
transmits identification information and the results of the agreed
upon authentication function(hash function).
3. Send the third message from TN
In the third (3) message, the initiator send the results of the
agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
4. Receive the fourth message from NUT
In the second message (4), the responder indicates either an ISAKMP
Notify Payload or an ISAKMP delete Payload.
* PHASE II
QUICK MODE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT)
(1) HDR*, HASH(1),
SA, Ni ========>
(2) X <======== HDR*, HASH(2), SA, Nr <-----Must not transmit
Judgement (Check *2)
1. Send the first message from TN
In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it
considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The
Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included
in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
And initiator send HASH(1) and Nonce. HASH(1) is the prf over the
message id (M-ID) from the ISAKMP header concatenated with the entire
message that follows the hash including all payload headers,
but excluding any padding added for encryption. Nonce is random
information which is used to guarantee liveness.
2. Receive the second message from NUT
In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection
suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and
Transform payloads. And responder send HASH(2) and Nonce.
HASH(2) is identical to HASH(1) except the initiator's nonce-- Ni,
minus the payload header-- is added after M-ID but before the
complete message. Nonce is random
information which is used to guarantee liveness.
=end html
=head1 JUDGEMENT
In AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE, the first to the second message must be exchanged correctly.
The third message must not be accepted.
And must not establish ISAKMP SA(In QUICK MODE, the second message must not transmit)
(* or INVALID-COOKIE message(4) may be returned).
*option : if you want to check the retruned Notify message.
=head1 TERMINATION
Clean up SAD and SPD
=head1 REFERENCE
=begin html
RFC2408
5.2 ISAKMP Header Processing
When creating an ISAKMP message, the transmitting entity (initiator
or responder) MUST do the following:
1. Create the respective cookie. See section 2.5.3 for details.
2. Determine the relevant security characteristics of the session
(i.e. DOI and situation).
3. Construct an ISAKMP Header with fields as described in section
3.1.
4. Construct other ISAKMP payloads, depending on the exchange type.
5. Transmit the message to the destination host as described in
section5.1.
When an ISAKMP message is received, the receiving entity (initiator
or responder) MUST do the following:
1. Verify the Initiator and Responder "cookies". If the cookie
validation fails, the message is discarded and the following
actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID COOKIE, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-COOKIE message type MAY be sent to
the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a
system security policy.
2. Check the Next Payload field to confirm it is valid. If the Next
Payload field validation fails, the message is discarded and the
following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID NEXT PAYLOAD, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-PAYLOAD-TYPE message type MAY be sent
to the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a
system security policy.
3. Check the Major and Minor Version fields to confirm they are
correct (see section 3.1). If the Version field validation
fails, the message is discarded and the following actions are
(a) The event, INVALID ISAKMP VERSION, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-MAJOR-VERSION or INVALID-MINOR-
VERSION message type MAY be sent to the transmitting entity.
This action is dictated by a system security policy.
4. Check the Exchange Type field to confirm it is valid. If the
Exchange Type field validation fails, the message is discarded
and the following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID EXCHANGE TYPE, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-EXCHANGE-TYPE message type MAY be
sent to the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by
a system security policy.
5. Check the Flags field to ensure it contains correct values. If
the Flags field validation fails, the message is discarded and
the following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID FLAGS, MAY be logged in the appropriate
systemaudit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-FLAGS message type MAY be sent to the
transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a system
security policy.
6. Check the Message ID field to ensure it contains correct values.
If the Message ID validation fails, the message is discarded and
the following actions are taken:
(a) The event, INVALID MESSAGE ID, MAY be logged in the
appropriate system audit file.
(b) An Informational Exchange with a Notification payload
containing the INVALID-MESSAGE-ID message type MAY be sent
to the transmitting entity. This action is dictated by a
system security policy.
7. Processing of the ISAKMP message continues using the value in the
Next Payload field.
(omit)
=end html
=head1 SEE ALSO
perldoc V6evalTool
=begin html
IKE.html IKE Test Common Utility
=end html
=cut