#!/usr/bin/perl # # Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Yokogawa Electric Corporation. # All rights reserved. # # Redistribution and use of this software in source and binary # forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that # the following conditions and disclaimer are agreed and accepted # by the user: # # 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. # # 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in # the documentation and/or other materials provided with # the distribution. # # 3. Neither the names of the copyrighters, the name of the project # which is related to this software (hereinafter referred to as # "project") nor the names of the contributors may be used to # endorse or promote products derived from this software without # specific prior written permission. # # 4. No merchantable use may be permitted without prior written # notification to the copyrighters. # # 5. The copyrighters, the project and the contributors may prohibit # the use of this software at any time. # # THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHTERS, THE PROJECT AND # CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING # BUT NOT LIMITED THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS # FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE # COPYRIGHTERS, THE PROJECT OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, # INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES # (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR # SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) # HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, # STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING # IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE # POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. # # $TAHI: ct/ike/SGW/SG_R_RFC2408_4_2_P2_1.seq,v 1.31.2.2 2005/11/22 10:06:07 ozoe Exp $ # $Id: SG_R_RFC2408_4_2_P2_1.seq,v 1.31.2.2 2005/11/22 10:06:07 ozoe Exp $ # ###################################################################### BEGIN { } use V6evalTool; use IKE; use IKE_check; my $IF0 = Link0; my $IF1 = Link1; #====== get sequence arguments ====== foreach (@ARGV) { /^test_type=(\S+)/ && do {$TEST_TYPE=$1; next; }; /^support=(\S+)/ && do {$SUPPORT=$1; next; }; /^app_type=(\S+)/ && do {$IKE::APP_TYPE=$1; next; }; /^test_phase=(\S+)/ && do {$IKE::TEST_PHASE=$1; next; }; ikeExitError("Unknown sequence option '$_'"); } #====== check NUT type ====== ikeCheckNUT(sgw, $TEST_TYPE, $SUPPORT); #====== Test Configuration ====== %ikeConfig = ( 'app_type' => 'ICMP', 'isakmp_src' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NUT_NET2_SGW1_ADDR}", 'isakmp_dst' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET3_SGW2_ADDR}", 'isakmp_dport' => '500', 'isakmp_ex_mode' => 'main', 'isakmp_doi' => 'ipsec_doi', 'isakmp_situation' => 'identity_only', 'isakmp_key_id' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET3_SGW2_ADDR}", 'isakmp_key_value' => 'IKE-TEST', 'isakmp_enc_alg' => '3des', 'isakmp_hash_alg' => 'sha1', 'isakmp_auth_method' => 'pre_shared_key', 'isakmp_dh_group' => '2', 'isakmp_lt' => '28800', 'isakmp_lt_unit' => 'seconds', 'isakmp_src_id_type' => 'address', 'isakmp_src_id' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NUT_NET2_SGW1_ADDR}", 'isakmp_dst_id_type' => 'address', 'isakmp_dst_id' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET3_SGW2_ADDR}", 'isakmp_num_pro' => '1', 'isakmp_num_trans' => '1', 'ipsec_id_type' => 'address', 'ipsec_dst' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NET4_ADDR}", 'ipsec_src' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NET0_ADDR}", 'ipsec_dst_id' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NET4_ADDR}", 'ipsec_src_id' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NET0_ADDR}", 'ipsec_tdst' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET3_SGW2_ADDR}", 'ipsec_tsrc' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_NUT_NET2_SGW1_ADDR}", 'ipsec_end_dst' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET4_HOST2_ADDR}", 'ipsec_end_src' => "$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET0_HOST1_ADDR}", 'ipsec_supper' => 'any', 'ipsec_dupper' => 'any', 'ipsec_direction' => 'both', 'ipsec_pfs_group' => 'off', 'ipsec_p_num' => '1', 'ipsec_p1_proto' => 'PROTO_IPSEC_ESP', 'ipsec_p1_t_num' => '1', 'ipsec_p1_t1_enc_alg' => 'ESP_3DES', 'ipsec_p1_t1_auth_mtd' => 'HMAC_SHA', 'ipsec_p1_t1_mode' => 'Tunnel', 'ipsec_p1_t1_lt' => '8', 'ipsec_p1_t1_lt_unit' => 'hour', # 'ipsec_sa_bundle' => '1,2', 'ipsec_send_id' => 'on', 'ipsec_p_send_proto' => 'PROTO_IPSEC_ESP', 'ipsec_p_send_trans' => '1', 'ipsec_p_select_alg' => 'ESP_3DES', 'ipsec_p_select_auth_mtd' => 'HMAC_SHA', 'ipsec_p_select_mode' => 'Tunnel', 'ipsec_p_select_lt' => '8', 'ipsec_p_select_lt_unit' => 'hour', 'ipsec_p_select_num' => '2', 'ipsec_p_select_transnum' => '2', ); #====== set TN's cookie ======== my $cookie = GetMD5("$IKE::IKEAddr{IKE_TN_NET3_SGW2_ADDR}"."$ikeConfig{'isakmp_dport'}".time()); $cookie = substr($cookie, 0, 16); my $nonce = '00000000000000000000000000000000'; $ikeConfig{'isakmp_cookie_i'} = $cookie; $ikeConfig{'isakmp_nonce_i'} = $nonce; $ikeConfig{'ipsec_nonce_i'} = '00000000000000000000000000000001'; $ikeConfig{'ipsec_spi_i'} = '0x00001000'; $ikeConfig{'ipsec_message_id'} = '0000ffff'; vLogHTML("CKY-I: $ikeConfig{'isakmp_cookie_i'}
") if $IKE::remote_debug; vLogHTML("Ni-b: $ikeConfig{'isakmp_nonce_i'}
") if $IKE::remote_debug; vLogHTML("pre_shared key: $ikeConfig{'isakmp_key_value'}
") if $IKE::remote_debug; #====== set other date about this test ======== #====== set ISAKMP SA, IPSEC SPD #====== vLogHTML("*** Target IKE initialization phase ***
"); ikeInit(%ikeConfig); #====== set Address of NUT ====== vLogHTML("*** Target initialization phase ***
"); vCapture($IF0); vCapture($IF1); ikeSetAddr($IF0,$IF1,$IKE::address_debug); #====== set ISAKMP SA packet frame, parameter #====== my $cpp = undef; my @ike = (); my %ret1 = ikePh2PreSeqR($IF0,$cpp,\@ike, \%ikeConfig); #====================================================================== vLogHTML("*** Target testing phase start ***
"); #====================================================================== #------------------------------------------------------------------- vLogHTML("*** Phase-2 1st message send ***
"); #------------------------------------------------------------------- vClear($IF0); vClear($IF1); $cpp = "-DPHASE2_MULTI_PROPOSAL "; my %ret2 = ikePh2Send1st($IF0, 5, 0, 0, $cpp, \@ike, \%ret1, \%ikeConfig); if($ret2{'status'} == $IKE::FAIL) { ikeReset(); exit($V6evalTool::exitFail); } #------------------------------------------------------------------- vLogHTML("*** Phase-2 2nd message recv ***
"); #------------------------------------------------------------------- my @CHECK_FLAG = undef; $CHECK_FLAG[0] = shiftFlag(2) + shiftFlag(3); #transform payload #my $OPTION_FLAG = $IKE_check::optionHash{'monotonicNumberCheck'};; my $OPTION_FLAG = $IKE_check::optionHash{'ProposalNumberCheck'} + $IKE_check::optionHash{'TransformNumberCheck'}; my %ret3 = ikePh2Recv2nd($IF0, 5, 0, 0, $cpp, \@ike, \%ret2, \%ikeConfig,\@CHECK_FLAG,$OPTION_FLAG); if($ret3{'status'} == $IKE::FAIL) { ikeReset(); exit($V6evalTool::exitFail); } #------------------------------------------------------------------- vLogHTML("Multiple Proposal and Transform Payloads (select proposal) is correct
"); #------------------------------------------------------------------- #====================================================================== vLogHTML("*** Target test finish ***
"); #====================================================================== vStop($IF0); vStop($IF1); ikeReset(); ikeExitPass(); #NOTREACHED ###################################################################### __END__ =head1 NAME SG_R_RFC2408_4_2_P2_1 - [Responder Test] Multiple Proposal and Transform Payloads check(select proposal) =head1 TARGET SGW =head1 SYNOPSIS =begin html
  SG_R_RFC2408_4_2_P2_1.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt SG_R_RFC2408_4_2_P2_1.def -tooloption : v6eval tool option
  See also ike_common.def and ike_ipsec.def and ike_addr.def and ike_pkt_ph1_recv.def and ike_pkt_ph2_recv.def
=end html =head1 INITIALIZATION =begin html
  • Network Topology
  •                                  HOST-2(TN)
                                       |3ffe:501:ffff:104::11
                                       |
    Net-v   --+------------------------+-------- 3ffe:501:ffff:104::/64
              |
              |
             SGW-2(TN):initiator
              |3ffe:501:ffff:103::11
              |                     
    Net-w   --+--------+------------------------ 3ffe:501:ffff:103::/64
                       |
                       |
                      ROUTER-2(TN)
                       | 3ffe:501:ffff:102::11
                       |
    Net-x   --+--------+------------------------ 3ffe:501:ffff:102::/64
              |
              |3ffe:501:ffff:102::1
             SGW-1(NUT):responder
              |3ffe:501:ffff:101::1
              |
    Net-y   --+--------+------------------------ 3ffe:501:ffff:101::/64
                       |
                       | 3ffe:501:ffff:101::11
                      ROUTER-1(TN)
                       |
                       |
    Net-z   -----------+---------------+-------- 3ffe:501:ffff:100::/64
                                       |
                                       |3ffe:501:ffff:100::13
                                     HOST-1(TN)
      

  • Verification Points
    • 	   
    • An initiator MAY provide multiple proposals for negotiation; a responder MUST reply with only one.
    • The receiving entity MUST select a single transform for each protocol in a proposal or reject the entire proposal.
    • When responding to a Security Association payload, the responder MUST send a Security Association payload with the selected proposal, which may consist of multiple Proposal payloads and their associated Transform payloads. Each of the Proposal payloads MUST contain a single Transform payload associated with the Protocol. The responder SHOULD retain the Proposal # field in the Proposal payload and the Transform # field in each Transform payload of the selected Proposal.

  • Configuration
    •        
    • Initiator and Responder IKE parameter
    • At least, following parameter must be included in proposal.
      Machine Src Dest Phase I Phase II
      Ex mode Key Value Enc Alg Hash Alg Auth Method DH Group PH1 Lt IDx

      Prop # Proto ID Trans # Trans ID Mode Auth Alg PH2 Lt IDci IDcr Upper
      SGW-1 SGW-1 addr SGW-2 addr Main IKE-TEST 3DES SHA pre-shared key 2 8 Hour SGW-1 addr PROTO_IPSEC_ESP ESP_3DES Tunnel HMAC-SHA 8 Hour
      SGW-2 SGW-2 addr SGW-1 addr Main IKE-TEST 3DES SHA pre-shared key 2 8 Hour SGW-2 addr 1 PROTO_IPSEC_AH 1 249 Tunnel 61440 8 Hour Net-v addr Net-z addr any
      2 250 Tunnel 61441 8 Hour
      2 PROTO_IPSEC_ESP 1 249 Tunnel 61440 8 Hour
      2 ESP_3DES Tunnel HMAC-SHA 8 Hour
      *Ex Mode = Exchange mode(Aggresive mode can also be chosen as Ex Mode) *IDx = identity payload(FQDN or user FQDN can also be chosen as IDx) *IDci = identity payload *IDcr = identity payload *Enc Alg = IKE Encryption Algorithm *Hash Alg = IKE Authentication Algorithm *Key Value = pre-shared key value *PH1 Lt = Phase-1 Lifetime *PH2 Lt = Phase-2 Lifetime *Prop # = Proposal number *Proto ID = Protocol Identifier *Trans # = Transform number *Trans ID = Transform Identifier *Mode = Encapsulation Mode *Auth Alg = Authentication Algorithm *Auth Method = Authentication Method *DH Group = Diffie-Hellman Group *Upper = Upper Layer Protocol *SGW-1 addr = SGW-1 address *SGW-2 addr = SGW-2 address *Net-z = Net-z network address *Net-v = Net-v network address
=end html =head1 TEST PROCEDURE =begin html
  This test check is following.

* PHASE I
Either IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE or AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE is performed as a pre sequence.

IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) (1) HDR; SA ========>
(2) <======== HDR; SA
(3) HDR; KE; NONCE ========>
(4) <======== HDR; KE; NONCE
(5) HDR*; IDii; HASH_I ========>
(6) <======== HDR*; IDir; HASH_R
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
2. Receive the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads.
3. Send the third message from TN In the third (3) message, the initiator send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
4. Receive the fourth message from NUT In the fourth (4) message, the responder send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
5. Send the fifth message from TN In the fifth (5) message, the initiator send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
6. Receive the sixth message from NUT In the sixth (6) message, the responder send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).

AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) NOTE (1) HDR; SA; KE; => Begin ISAKMP-SA or Proxy negotiation NONCE; IDii and Key Exchange
(2) <= HDR; SA; KE; NONCE; IDir; AUTH Initiator Identity Verified by Responder Key Generated Basic SA agreed upon
(3) HDR*; AUTH => Responder Identity Verified by Initiator SA established
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). There can be only one Proposal and one Transform offered (i.e. no choices) in order for the aggressive exchange to work. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks are also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the initiator transmits identification information.
2. Recieve the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks is also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the responder transmits identification information. All of this information is transmitted under the protection of the agreed upon authentication function. Local security policy dictates the action of the responder if no proposed protection suite is accepted. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.
3. Send the third message from TN In the third (3) message, the initiator transmits the results of the agreed upon authentication function. This information is transmitted under the protection of the common shared secret. Local security policy dictates the action if an error occurs during these messages. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.

The test sequence is following.
* PHASE II
QUICK MODE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) (1) HDR*, HASH(1), SA, Ni,IDci, IDcr; ========>
(2) <======== HDR*, HASH(2), SA, Nr, IDci, IDcr; Judgement (Check *1)
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). And initiator send HASH(1) and Nonce. HASH(1) is the prf over the message id (M-ID) from the ISAKMP header concatenated with the entire message that follows the hash including all payload headers, but excluding any padding added for encryption. Nonce is random information which is used to guarantee liveness. IDci and IDcr is identification information.
2. Receive the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads. And responder send HASH(2) and Nonce. HASH(2) is identical to HASH(1) except the initiator's nonce-- Ni, minus the payload header-- is added after M-ID but before the complete message. Nonce is random information which is used to guarantee liveness. IDci and IDcr is identification information.
=end html =head1 JUDGEMENT In Phase I , messages must be exchanged correctly. In Phase II , the first message must be accepted. The second message that has two Proposal(Proposal # = 2) and only one Transform(Transform # = 2) (attribute is ESP_3DES, Transport, HMAC-SHA, 8 Hour) must be returned. =head1 TERMINATION Clean up SAD and SPD =head1 REFERENCE =begin html
  RFC2408
  4.1.1 Notation

(omit)
SA is an SA negotiation payload with one or more Proposal and Transform payloads. An initiator MAY provide multiple proposals for negotiation; a responder MUST reply with only one.
(omit)
4.2 Security Association Establishment
(omit)
The Transform payload provides the initiating entity with the capability to present to the responding entity multiple mechanisms, or transforms, for a given protocol. The Proposal payload identifies a Protocol for which services and mechanisms are being negotiated. The Transform payload allows the initiating entity to present several possible supported transforms for that proposed protocol. There may be several transforms associated with a specific Proposal payload each identified in a separate Transform payload. The multiple transforms MUST be presented with monotonically increasing numbers in the initiator's preference order. The receiving entity MUST select a single transform for each protocol in a proposal or reject the entire proposal. The use of the Transform number in multiple Transform payloads provides a second level OR operation, i.e. Transform 1 OR Transform 2 OR Transform 3. Example 1 below shows two possible transforms for ESP and a single transform for AH. Example 2 below shows one transform for AH AND one transform for ESP OR two transforms for ESP alone. Note that the Next Payload field of the Transform payload points to another Transform payload or 0. The Proposal payload delineates the different proposals.
When responding to a Security Association payload, the responder MUST send a Security Association payload with the selected proposal, which may consist of multiple Proposal payloads and their associated Transform payloads. Each of the Proposal payloads MUST contain a single Transform payload associated with the Protocol. The responder SHOULD retain the Proposal # field in the Proposal payload and the Transform # field in each Transform payload of the selected Proposal. Retention of Proposal and Transform numbers should speed the initiator's protocol processing by negating the need to compare the respondor's selection with every offered option. These values enable the initiator to perform the comparison directly and quickly. The initiator MUST verify that the Security Association payload received from the responder matches one of the proposals sent initially.
RFC2409 3.2 Notation
(omit)
SA is an SA negotiation payload with one or more proposals. An initiator MAY provide multiple proposals for negotiation; a responder MUST reply with only one.
(omit)
=end html =head1 SEE ALSO perldoc V6evalTool =begin html
  IKE.html IKE Test Common Utility
=end html =cut