NAME

  SG_R_RFC2409_5_5_wo_pfs - [Responder Test] Key Exchange Payload w/o PFS


TARGET

  SGW


SYNOPSIS

  SG_R_RFC2409_5_5_wo_pfs.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt SG_R_RFC2409_5_5_wo_pfs.def -tooloption : v6eval tool option
See also ike_common.def and ike_ipsec.def and ike_addr.def and ike_pkt_ph1_recv.def and ike_pkt_ph2_recv.def


INITIALIZATION


TEST PROCEDURE

  This test check is following.

* PHASE I
Either IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE or AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE is performed as a pre sequence.

IDENTITY PROTECTION EXCHANGE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) (1) HDR; SA ========>
(2) <======== HDR; SA
(3) HDR; KE; NONCE ========>
(4) <======== HDR; KE; NONCE
(5) HDR*; IDii; HASH_I ========>
(6) <======== HDR*; IDir; HASH_R
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes).
2. Receive the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads.
3. Send the third message from TN In the third (3) message, the initiator send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
4. Receive the fourth message from NUT In the fourth (4) message, the responder send keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks.
5. Send the fifth message from TN In the fifth (5) message, the initiator send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).
6. Receive the sixth message from NUT In the sixth (6) message, the responder send identification information and the results of the agreed upon authentication function(hash function).

AGGRESSIVE EXCHANGE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) NOTE (1) HDR; SA; KE; => Begin ISAKMP-SA or Proxy negotiation NONCE; IDii and Key Exchange
(2) <= HDR; SA; KE; NONCE; IDir; AUTH Initiator Identity Verified by Responder Key Generated Basic SA agreed upon
(3) HDR*; AUTH => Responder Identity Verified by Initiator SA established
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). There can be only one Proposal and one Transform offered (i.e. no choices) in order for the aggressive exchange to work. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks are also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the initiator transmits identification information.
2. Recieve the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads. Keying material used to arrive at a common shared secret and random information which is used to guarantee liveness and protect against replay attacks is also transmitted. Random information provided by both parties SHOULD be used by the authentication mechanism to provide shared proof of participation in the exchange. Additionally, the responder transmits identification information. All of this information is transmitted under the protection of the agreed upon authentication function. Local security policy dictates the action of the responder if no proposed protection suite is accepted. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.
3. Send the third message from TN In the third (3) message, the initiator transmits the results of the agreed upon authentication function. This information is transmitted under the protection of the common shared secret. Local security policy dictates the action if an error occurs during these messages. One possible action is the transmission of a Notify payload as part of an Informational Exchange.

The test sequence is following.
* PHASE II
QUICK MODE
# Initiator(TN) Direction Responder(NUT) (1) HDR*, HASH(1), SA, Ni,IDci, IDcr; ========>
(2) <======== HDR*, HASH(2), SA, Nr, IDci, IDcr; <--- must not send KE payload. Judgement (Check *1)
1. Send the first message from TN In the first message (1), the initiator generates a proposal it considers adequate to protect traffic for the given situation. The Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads are included in the Security Association payload (for notation purposes). And initiator send HASH(1) and Nonce. HASH(1) is the prf over the message id (M-ID) from the ISAKMP header concatenated with the entire message that follows the hash including all payload headers, but excluding any padding added for encryption. Nonce is random information which is used to guarantee liveness. IDci and IDcr is identification information.
2. Receive the second message from NUT In the second message (2), the responder indicates the protection suite it has accepted with the Security Association, Proposal, and Transform payloads. And responder send HASH(2) and Nonce. HASH(2) is identical to HASH(1) except the initiator's nonce-- Ni, minus the payload header-- is added after M-ID but before the complete message. Nonce is random information which is used to guarantee liveness. IDci and IDcr is identification information.


JUDGEMENT

        In Phase I , messages must be exchanged correctly.
        In Phase II , the first message must be accepted.  
        And the second message which must not has KE payload,
        must be received and must be base on description of RFC 
        (see above Verification Points).
        And must conform to above Configuration.


TERMINATION

  Clean up SAD and SPD


REFERENCE

  RFC2409
  5.5 Phase 2 - Quick Mode

(omit)
If PFS is not needed, and KE payloads are not exchanged, the new keying material is defined as
KEYMAT = prf(SKEYID_d, protocol | SPI | Ni_b | Nr_b).
If PFS is desired and KE payloads were exchanged, the new keying material is defined as
KEYMAT = prf(SKEYID_d, g(qm)^xy | protocol | SPI | Ni_b | Nr_b)
where g(qm)^xy is the shared secret from the ephemeral Diffie-Hellman exchange of this Quick Mode.


SEE ALSO

  perldoc V6evalTool
  IKE.html IKE Test Common Utility