Hi, all
"::" is unspecified address
"::/0" is default route.
So I think it should use "::/0"
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yukiyo Akisada" <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
To: <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com>
Cc: <users@tahi.org>
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [users:00005] A small bug on route.rmt
> Hi, all.
> Is there linux guys, here?
>
> Linux interface is sometime changing.
> And we aren't follow it.
>
> Please give us suggestion.
> Which should be used? "::" or "::/0".
>
> Regards.
>
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2005 09:18:41 +0800
> "Lv Liangying" <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, all
>>
>> I found a small bug on route.rmt. The version of v6eval is 2.3.1
>>
>> I am using TAHI to test Linux IPv6, when I test pmtu#1, I encountered a problem. TN need to add route in NUT.it will call route.rmt, In which it defines the route command:
>>
>> v6eval/bin/remotes/linux-v6/route.rmt
>>
>> if ($rOpt_addrfamily eq "inet6") {
>> if ($rOpt_prefix eq "default") {
>> rCommand("$ROUTECMD ".
>> "-A $rOpt_addrfamily ".
>> "$NUT_cmd ".
>> ":: ".
>> "gw $rOpt_gateway ".
>> "dev $rOpt_if",
>> $rOpt_timeout) || goto error;
>> }
>>
>> It says if our family equal "inet6" and prefix equal "default", then when use route add command then it will change to "::", isn't it?
>> But I think it shall change to "::/0", which means default route.
>> What's your opinion?
>>
>>
>> BTW: why do you change it to "::" or "::/0"? Doesn't it just mean default?
>>
>> Thank you in advance!!
>>
>> B.R. Lv Liangying
>
>
> ----
> Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>