Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:01:49 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00011] Re: A small  bug on route.rmt
To: Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20050510140149.45379955.Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <01de01c5545b$5ecb3520$6a04a8c0@lly>
References: <00fe01c55435$09370dd0$6a04a8c0@lly>	<20050509144446.558e171f.Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>	<01de01c5545b$5ecb3520$6a04a8c0@lly>
X-Mail-Count: 00011

OK.
I will apply it.
If any other guys have opinions, please let us know.

Thanks.


On Mon, 9 May 2005 13:53:05 +0800
"Lv Liangying" <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com> wrote:

> Hi, all
> 
> "::" is unspecified address
> "::/0" is default route.
> 
> So I think it should use "::/0"
> 
> Regards
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Yukiyo Akisada" <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
> To: <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com>
> Cc: <users@tahi.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [users:00005] A small bug on route.rmt
> 
> 
> > Hi, all.
> > Is there linux guys, here?
> > 
> > Linux interface is sometime changing.
> > And we aren't follow it.
> > 
> > Please give us suggestion.
> > Which should be used? "::" or "::/0".
> > 
> > Regards.
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 9 May 2005 09:18:41 +0800
> > "Lv Liangying" <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello, all
> >> 
> >> I found a small bug on route.rmt. The version of v6eval is 2.3.1
> >> 
> >> I am using TAHI to test Linux IPv6, when I test pmtu#1, I encountered a problem. TN need to add route in NUT.it will call route.rmt, In which it defines the route command:
> >> 
> >> v6eval/bin/remotes/linux-v6/route.rmt
> >> 
> >> if ($rOpt_addrfamily eq "inet6") {
> >>     if ($rOpt_prefix eq "default") {
> >>  rCommand("$ROUTECMD ".
> >>    "-A $rOpt_addrfamily ".
> >>    "$NUT_cmd ".
> >>    ":: ".
> >>    "gw $rOpt_gateway ".
> >>    "dev $rOpt_if",
> >>    $rOpt_timeout) || goto error;
> >>     } 
> >> 
> >> It says if our family equal "inet6" and prefix equal "default", then when use route add command then it will change to "::", isn't it?
> >> But I think it shall change to "::/0", which means default route. 
> >> What's your opinion?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> BTW: why do you change it to "::" or "::/0"? Doesn't it just mean default?
> >> 
> >> Thank you in advance!!
> >> 
> >> B.R. Lv Liangying
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>

----
Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>