Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:17:04 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@64translator.com>
Subject: [users:00046] Re: problem configuring v6eval and ct on alpha-freebsd system.
To: nesari@india.hp.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20050617101704.7395fac5.akisada@64translator.com>
In-Reply-To: <1118837467.1320.211.camel@nt218135.india.hp.com>
References: <1118823753.1320.199.camel@nt218135.india.hp.com>	<20050615190535.28d0192e.akisada@64translator.com>	<1118837467.1320.211.camel@nt218135.india.hp.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00046

Hi, Akshay.

On 15 Jun 2005 17:41:08 +0530
Akshay Nesari <nesari@india.hp.com> wrote:

> > Actually, we have only i386 environment.
> > So, we could test only for i386.
> > 
> > Could you send me backtrace of gdb?
> > But we can't promise to fix it because of our environment.
> I have attached the gdb backtrace.
> > 
> > And if you can, I recommend that you use i386.
> Thanks for the information, I will try and use a i386 system.
> Do you recommend using FreeBSD 5.4 as tester node (tn.def) OR
> should I install stable 4.x version ?

Both of them can be used.

I was using both for developping,
if you have to prepare stable TN, I recommend that you use 4.X.

4.X with v6eval has longer history than 4.X with v6eval.

Thanks,


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@64translator.com>