Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:29:10 +0900
From: enokihara hideshi <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00140] Re: Do you mean that HA should act as CN?
To: mobility_students@rambler.ru
Cc: <users@tahi.org>, contact@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20051006102910.424faa30.Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <web-35704745@mail7.rambler.ru>
References: <web-35704745@mail7.rambler.ru>
X-Mail-Count: 00140

Hi Irina,

TAHI has other contact point about MIPv6.
Please send this e-mail to "mipv6_support@v6pc.jp".

Best Regards,

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:29:18 +0900
"Irina Kostitsyna" <mobility_students@rambler.ru> wrote:

> [users:00139] Do you mean that HA should act as CN?
> 
> Hello, TAHI
> 
> I've run your Conformance Test For Home Agent. And I think that in
> some of your tests you mean that HA should act as CN (like in sending
> messages BE etc.) Is it true?
> 


-- 
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation