Date: 29 Nov 2005 14:14:53 -0000 From: "PRAMENDRA SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> Subject: [users:00184] Issue regarding test case no. 47 To: dnstest@tahi.org Message-Id: <20051129141453.25895.qmail@webmail10.rediffmail.com> X-Mail-Count: 00184Hi I also have an issue regarding test case no. 47.... the NUT receives= response where the most significant bit of the TTL is set. So that NUT s=hould consider it as zero....Now in the next step NUT is supossed to send= query within 10 secs...& that should not reach to the TN...that means it= should be able to reply from its cache itself.... Now the most surprisin=g thing is that how can the NUT reply from its cache coz it got the respo=nse with TTL as zero...& as per all RFCs(1034, 1035), the data with TTL =value zero should not be cached (Reference RFC1035, 3.2.1, RFC1034, 3.6, =RFC2065 4.4)... if the TTL value is zero.. Please comment.... thanks= & regards Prem184_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)