Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:57:42 +0900
From: Hideshi Enokihara <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00198] Re: [dnstest:00028]
To: "PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com>
Cc: dnstest@tahi.org, users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20051208135742.6eaacc27.Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051208035110.17310.qmail@webmail30.rediffmail.com>
References: <20051208035110.17310.qmail@webmail30.rediffmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00198

Hi Prem,

Thank you for your report.
This is bug in the test scripts.
Test Specification is right.

We will fix this bug in next release.
Please wait for a while.

Sorry for your inconvenience.

Best Regards,

On 8 Dec 2005 03:51:10 -0000
"PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> wrote:

>  __> Hi
> 
> As per the new release(6th Dec) of DNS Client test cases
> I got an issue regarding test case no. 55 . In the new release
> the test sequence is changed,...specifically in the 4th step, 
> where NUT is suppossed to send query (example.com) for qtype=SOA
> & as per the test sequence it must reach to the TN...But whenever this 
> query goes to TN, the script says the test got failed coz it received this packet...
> Its bit contradictory with respect to the test sequence....
> 
> Please share your valuable comments 
> 
> thanks & regards
> 
> Prem
> 


-- 
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation