Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:02:09 +0900
From: <Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00200] Re: [dnstest:00029] Got an issure regarding test case no. 53
To: <parma_it@rediffmail.com>, <dnstest@tahi.org>
Cc: <users@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <2B29614385FE6F47BF39423C0AB1524E01394AF7@EXCHANGE02.jp.ykgw.net>
References: <20051208040610.17933.qmail@webmail53.rediffmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00200

Hi,
 
I can't understand that you said "how the NUT will cache it".
Could you teach me your opinion?
 
Best regards,
 
________________________________

From: PRAMENDRA SINGH [mailto:parma_it@rediffmail.com]
Sent: 2005/12/08 (木) 13:06
To: dnstest@tahi.org
Cc: users@tahi.org
Subject: [dnstest:00029] Got an issure regarding test case no. 53



Hi

As per the new release(6th Dec) of DNS Client test cases
I got an issue regarding test case no. 53. 
As per test sequence....

1. NUT first sends query (A.example.com) to TN
2. Server (TN) does not send response within 120 seconds...
3. NUT must send query (A.example.com) to the TN..but it should not reach the TN...
NUT should be able to 

I got the doubt here in the 3rd step...If the server is not going to send
any response then how the NUT will cache it...so that in the next time (in the 3rd step)
definitely the packet will go to the TN...

Please let me know whether my analysis is right or wrong...

Your comments are always valuable for me...

thanks & regards

Prem  




 <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3>