Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:39:31 +0900
From: Hideshi Enokihara <Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00215] Re: [dnstest:00038] got a doubt regarding test case 37
To: "PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com>
Cc: dnstest@tahi.org, users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20051227133931.02489e9f.Hideshi.Enokihara@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051226042859.17808.qmail@webmail63.rediffmail.com>
References: <20051226042859.17808.qmail@webmail63.rediffmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00215

Hi Prem,

Thank you for your report.

On 26 Dec 2005 04:28:59 -0000
"PRAMENDRA  SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> wrote:

>  __> Hi
> 
> I got an issue regarding test case 37...
> here as per the (packet) description of 2nd packet,
> in the additional section  NAME=NS2.invalid.com.
> but in the script  ' ' (empty) is sent. thats why 3rd time the resolver
> wont know where to send the query....also one more thing...

We will fix this bug in next release.
Thanks.

> in the 3rd step the query should be sent qutomatically to the DNS Server2
> & it should not reach also.....how this can be possible....
> The same sequence is there(only the 3rd step) in test case 76 & 45 also...where 
> the test sequence never says that the query should not reach to the server...

Please tell me test title,
ex. CL_RFC1035_7_4_cache_RRs - Caching several RRs of same type
 
It is difficult to specify the test only by the test number. 
Thank you for your cooperation. 

Best Regards,

> Please comment on this....
> 
> thanks & regards
> Prem
> 


-- 
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation