Date: 31 Dec 2005 03:44:27 -0000 From: "PRAMENDRA SINGH" <parma_it@rediffmail.com> Subject: [users:00218] test case 33 To: "dnstest" <dnstest@tahi.org> Message-Id: <20051231034427.29181.qmail@webmail7.rediffmail.com> X-Mail-Count: 00218Hi In test case 33(CL_RFC1034_5_3_3_cache_delegation - Analyze the res=ponse(caching delegation)), the TN sends a delegation in the 2nd step, w=here in the authority section we get the referal of NS2.example.com. & i=n the additional section we get the IP address for this NS2.example.com. = But in realty in the additional section it comes as NS2.NS2.example.com.= the NAME contents that I checked like, not providing the client caching =functionality.. I mean I dint run the caching server locally...just like =normal test cases where we donot need the caching functionality... exe=cuted the query like this dig A.example.com. (no caching) then I got= answer section empty, authority section (NSDNAME) contains NS2.example.com= but the additional section (NAME) contains NS2.NS2.example.com As p=er my knowledge is concerned I know it should always be the same, I mean th=e NSDNAME (authority section) & NAME (additional section) contents...also i=n RFC 1034 there are lots of examples in the section 6.2 & onwards....whe=re no where I found the dissimilarity... please let me know whether my= analysis is right or wrong... expecting your comments.... thanks= & regrads Prem218_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)