Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:35:24 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: [users:00224] Re: v6eval tool bug: IPv4 timestamp option
To: users@tahi.org
Cc: Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com
Message-Id: <20060110183524.00924dd3.Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
In-Reply-To: <035f01c61598$7f87db20$6204a8c0@lly>
References: <035f01c61598$7f87db20$6204a8c0@lly>
X-Mail-Count: 00224

Hi, Liangying.

I will fix it soon.
Thanks for reporting.

Regards,

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:46:52 +0800
"Lv Liangying" <Lvly@nanjing-fnst.com> wrote:

> In the above bold displayed section, v6eval define the size of timestamp is 8 bit.
> however, according to RFC791([Page 22], Internet Timestamp)
>   The Timestamp is a right-justified, 32-bit timestamp in milliseconds since midnight UT. 
> 
> So this is a bug in v6eval, and we test timestamp option, if  it set to 8bit, then it will be overflowed.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>