Hi, akisada.
I am glad to see the good news about major revision release from you.
Thank you again for your rely on time.
Regards,
Zhiyong Wu
Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> Hi, Zhiyong.
>
> In this moment, we will support RH0 as selectable function.
> But it may be changed to be mandatory
> because RH0 ID was already entered in RFC Editor Queue few days ago.
>
> Now, situation around RH0 is changed day by day.
> We need still more discussion.
>
> But, personally,
> I feel that it is realistic to release at November.
> And it will be the End of November.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:00:17 -0400
> Zhiyong Wu <zwu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, akisada.
>>
>> At first, thank you very much for your reply last time.
>>
>> As discribed in your last reply, major revision up will be done at
>> November or May.
>>
>> If your major revision would be released at May, how should we process
>> this case when we are eager to have an IPv6ready Certification before it?
>>
>> How is the possibility that you will release the major revision at November?
>>
>> Need you any necessary help from us in order to promote that the major
>> revision will be earlier released?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zhiyong Wu.
>>
>>
>> Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Zhiyong.
>>>
>>> IPv6 Ready Logo Program has already started preparation to support RH0 issue.
>>> Please wait the next major revision up of Program itself.
>>>
>>> By the definition of IPv6 Ready Logo Program,
>>> major revision up is done at November or May.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:17:27 -0400
>>> Zhiyong Wu <zwu@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tahi users and developers,
>>>>
>>>> As well-known,when the type of IPv6 routing header is set to IPV6_RTHDR_YPE_0,
>>>>
>>>> it would allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via
>>>>
>>>> crafted IPv6 type 0 route headers that create network
>>>>
>>>> amplification between two routers.
>>>>
>>>> In the current time,the solution which is adopted by many products
>>>>
>>>> wil cause IPv6 type 0 routing headers to be ignored. But the test scripts
>>>>
>>>> from www.tahi.org dont ignored IPv6 type 0 headers.
>>>>
>>>> So when we are having a IPv6ready Certification,some tests about
>>>>
>>>> IPv6 type 0 routing header will fail if Self_Test from www.tahi.org
>>>>
>>>> isn't modified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> how should we process this case when we are ready to have a IPv6ready
>>>>
>>>> Certification?
>>>>
>>>> please refer to
>>>>
>>>> (1) http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:03.ipv6.asc
>>>>
>>>> (2) http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2242
>>>>
>>>> (3) http://www.secdev.org/conf/IPv6_RH_security-csw07.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Zhiyong Wu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
>