Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> Hi, Zhiyong Wu.
>
> Thanks for your reporting.
>
> It should be Phase-1/Phase-2.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:31:35 -0400
> Zhiyong Wu <zwu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> TAHI developers and users,
>>
>> When we have an IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-1 Self_Test,
>>
>> we found a display problem about the mainpage of the report.
>>
>> It's title for Phase-1 is displayed as below shown:
>>
>>
>> IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 Self-Test Report
>>
>> The display will be confusing when we review the self_test
>> reports.
>>
>> As well known, it should be expected to display
>>
>>
>> IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-1 Self-Test Report
>>
>> Can TAHI developers fix the problem or not?
>>
>> Please refer to
>>
>> (1)http://www.tahi.org/ume/results/Self_Test_1-4-6/freebsd61.host/
>>
>> (2)http://www.tahi.org/ume/results/Self_Test_1-4-6/freebsd61.router/
>>
>> (3)http://www.tahi.org/ume/results/Self_Test_1-4-6/freebsd61.special/
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zhiyong Wu
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
>
hi, Yukiyo Akisada ,
It is our duty that we feedback some problems when using Self_Test
suites from TAHI.
It is hoped that IPv6 Ready Logo's Self_Test Suite can be more and more
perfect.
By the way, can i consult you of a quesiton about icmpv6?
From the information below shown, RFC2463 seems to be obsolete and
replaced with RFC4443.
Network Working Group A. Conta
Request for Comments: 4443 Transwitch
Obsoletes: 2463 S. Deering
Updates: 2780 Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track M. Gupta, Ed.
Tropos Networks
March 2006
Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6)
for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
please refer to
(1) ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4443.txt
(2) ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2463.txt
Why does ICMPv6 in Self_Test not adopt to RFC4443, but RFC2463?
What is the difference between RFC4443 and RFC2463?
Can you give me a reply?
Regards,
Zhiyong Wu