Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:07:50 +0900
From: Hiroshi MIYATA <miyata@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00464] Re: IPv6 Core Logo Phase 2 Interoperability Requirements
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <8B738F19-AD72-4F76-9680-63D839272177@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <OFAEB6DCA4.326E63A3-ON862573CC.005CD6E5-862573CC.005E87D1@us.ibm.com>
References: <OFAEB6DCA4.326E63A3-ON862573CC.005CD6E5-862573CC.005E87D1@us.ibm.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00464

Hi Christy,


You can find the test scenario for Logo at following URL.
http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html

Of course v6LC(Logo Committee) accepts manual operation.

Thanks,

....miyata

On 2008/01/11, at 2:12, Christy L Norman wrote:

>
> I am getting to the Interoperability portion of the Phase 2 Logo  
> tests and want to make clear what is acceptable for submission. I  
> see that there are tools (e.g. vel) to assist in this testing but  
> the platform I'm testing can't run those tools. The last time I  
> submitted Logo (Phase 1) results I ran the interoperability tests  
> manually and submitted the results of various pings, etc.
>
> Is it acceptable to follow the steps found on this page [http://www.tahi.org/inop/inop.html 
> ] for Host under each of the IPv6 Basic Specifications; On-Link, Off- 
> link Basic, and Redirect, Router Lifetime=0; and submit the results  
> of each ping, multicast join, etc. that are gathered manually?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Christy