Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:13:01 -0600 From: Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> Subject: [users:00469] Re: IPv6 Core Logo Phase 2 Interoperability Requirements To: users@tahi.org Message-Id: <OF56CC727F.9B5BFBE0-ON862573D2.0058649E-862573D2.0059154A@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8B738F19-AD72-4F76-9680-63D839272177@tahi.org> X-Mail-Count: 00469Miyata, Thank you for pointing me to that document. I looked at the Mobility scenario on the same page and see that the title page reads, "Interoperability Test Specification / Mobile IPv6 /w IKEv1 /Experimental version." Is there an interoperability document for Mobility that isn't experimental or is some part of the document experimental? If it is all experimental, is the process for submitting an application for a mobility logo different? Thanks, Christy Hiroshi MIYATA <miyata@tahi.org> 01/10/2008 06:07 PM Please respond to users@tahi.org To users@tahi.org cc Subject [users:00464] Re: IPv6 Core Logo Phase 2 Interoperability Requirements Hi Christy, You can find the test scenario for Logo at following URL. http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html Of course v6LC(Logo Committee) accepts manual operation. Thanks, ....miyata On 2008/01/11, at 2:12, Christy L Norman wrote: > > I am getting to the Interoperability portion of the Phase 2 Logo > tests and want to make clear what is acceptable for submission. I > see that there are tools (e.g. vel) to assist in this testing but > the platform I'm testing can't run those tools. The last time I > submitted Logo (Phase 1) results I ran the interoperability tests > manually and submitted the results of various pings, etc. > > Is it acceptable to follow the steps found on this page [http://www.tahi.org/inop/inop.html > ] for Host under each of the IPv6 Basic Specifications; On-Link, Off- > link Basic, and Redirect, Router Lifetime=0; and submit the results > of each ping, multicast join, etc. that are gathered manually? > > Thank you, > > Christy469_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)