Hi, Christy.
Are you talking about Mobility itself?
Or are you talking about Mobility using IKEv1?
If you are talking about the former and if you use manual keying,
you can use non-experimental documents.
You can find them on the same page.
MIPv6
* Phase-2 Policy (for release revision 1.1.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
* Phase-2 Policy Appendix (for release revision 1.1.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
* Test Specification Profile (for release revision 3.4.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
* Test Specifications
o Correspondent Node (CN) test Specificaion (for release revision 3.2.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
o Home Agent (HA) test Specification (for release revision 3.2.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
o Mobile Node (MN) test Specification (for release revision 3.2.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
* Interoperability test Specification (for release revision 1.5.0) (pdf file) (updated at 2007/11/8)
* Test tools
o Test Suite for test specification (IPv6PC/TAHI Project)
Regards,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:13:01 -0600
Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Miyata,
>
> Thank you for pointing me to that document. I looked at the Mobility
> scenario on the same page and see that the title page reads,
> "Interoperability Test Specification / Mobile IPv6 /w IKEv1 /Experimental
> version."
>
> Is there an interoperability document for Mobility that isn't experimental
> or is some part of the document experimental? If it is all experimental,
> is the process for submitting an application for a mobility logo
> different?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christy
>
>
>
>
>
> Hiroshi MIYATA <miyata@tahi.org>
> 01/10/2008 06:07 PM
> Please respond to
> users@tahi.org
>
>
> To
> users@tahi.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> [users:00464] Re: IPv6 Core Logo Phase 2 Interoperability Requirements
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Christy,
>
>
> You can find the test scenario for Logo at following URL.
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html
>
> Of course v6LC(Logo Committee) accepts manual operation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ....miyata
>
> On 2008/01/11, at 2:12, Christy L Norman wrote:
>
> >
> > I am getting to the Interoperability portion of the Phase 2 Logo
> > tests and want to make clear what is acceptable for submission. I
> > see that there are tools (e.g. vel) to assist in this testing but
> > the platform I'm testing can't run those tools. The last time I
> > submitted Logo (Phase 1) results I ran the interoperability tests
> > manually and submitted the results of various pings, etc.
> >
> > Is it acceptable to follow the steps found on this page
> [http://www.tahi.org/inop/inop.html
> > ] for Host under each of the IPv6 Basic Specifications; On-Link, Off-
> > link Basic, and Redirect, Router Lifetime=0; and submit the results
> > of each ping, multicast join, etc. that are gathered manually?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Christy
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>