Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:24:25 -0600 From: Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> Subject: [users:00479] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements To: users@tahi.org Message-Id: <OF7249C2DC.7CF7452C-ON862573D9.005479C7-862573D9.0054A1A2@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20080123084400.a6265ef8.akisada@tahi.org> X-Mail-Count: 00479Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to state that that is required. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM <cnorman@us.ibm.com> Software Engineer, i5/OS TCP/IP Development - 11400 Burnet Road 905/7B-016 Austin, TX 78758-3415 507.253.6125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> 01/22/2008 05:44 PM Please respond to users@tahi.org To Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS cc users@tahi.org Subject [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements Hi, Christy. First of all, are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols? If so, you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1. Thanks, On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600 Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need two vendors > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C) only one > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test twice, once with > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors' routers because > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers? > > Thanks, > > Christy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>479_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)