Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:30:15 -0700
From: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: [users:00480] Re: IPV6 routing header with type 0 doesn't support by latest kernel
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <4797CE07.7050202@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <BDC75A1E-9BF3-4B92-9C17-0170BAB06005@tahi.org>
References: <47746300.1020404@cn.fujitsu.com> <477851F3.9030402@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080101222240.r1dqh8wlc000gk4g@webmail.corp.redhat.com> <BDC75A1E-9BF3-4B92-9C17-0170BAB06005@tahi.org>
X-Mail-Count: 00480

Hi,

Let's not talk about the beta program. I need to pass Self_Test_1_4_9
and now our NUT is dropping the RH0 packet. Is that acceptable in your
evaluation process or we have to modify our program to pass "100%" of
your tests.

Thanks,
Yinghui Yao
Alcatel-Lucent

Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You know IPv6 Logo Program is planing to update the IPv6 core test
> specification.
> It was under public review.(until 3rd, Jan.)
> And RH0 is covered in the latest version under public review.
> Please visit here.
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/announcement/public_review20071204_p2core.html
>
>
> And the test tool is compliant to this test test specification.
> http://www.tahi.org/logo/release/Self_Test_1-5-0b1.tgz
>
> Disabling RH0 is not mandated at this moment, but it is selectable.
> We may need some discussion on this.
> Although, the public review is over, if you have some comments about
> this, v6LC welcome your comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ....miyata
>
> On 2008/01/02, at 12:22, sghosh@redhat.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Self Test 1.5.0-b2 (beta)
>> Includes the some of the bits to see if Type0 should be supported or
>> not.
>> See config.txt in the testsuite. RFC5095 was just published on
>> Standards Track
>> deprecating RH0 and specifying the required behavior. ICMP Parameter
>> Problem is
>> now required. The testsuite could not be changed until the RFC was
>> published.
>>
>> The original fix for the CVE in some distributions like RHEL was to
>> silently
>> drop the packet. That behavior needs to be updated.
>>
>> -regards
>> Subhendu Ghosh
>>
>>
>> Quoting Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>:
>>
>>> Who knows? :-)
>>>
>>> Gui Jianfeng 写道:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> IPV6 routing header with type 0 doesn't support by latest linux
>>>> kernel any more,
>>>> but some of the IPV6 ct test cases are still based on routing
>>>> header of type 0.
>>>> I'd like to know, whether this kind of test cases will be removed
>>>> or updated?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>> Development Dept.I
>>> Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
>>> 8/F., Civil Defense Building, No.189 Guangzhou Road,
>>> Nanjing, 210029, China
>>> TEL: +86+25-86630566-838
>>> COINS: 79955-838
>>> FAX: +86+25-83317685
>>> MAIL:guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>