Hi,
Can anyone please give me an answer for this?
Thanks,
Yinghui Yao
Alcatel-Lucent
Yinghui Yao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's not talk about the beta program. I need to pass Self_Test_1_4_9
> and now our NUT is dropping the RH0 packet. Is that acceptable in your
> evaluation process or we have to modify our program to pass "100%" of
> your tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
>
> Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> You know IPv6 Logo Program is planing to update the IPv6 core test
>> specification.
>> It was under public review.(until 3rd, Jan.)
>> And RH0 is covered in the latest version under public review.
>> Please visit here.
>> http://www.ipv6ready.org/announcement/public_review20071204_p2core.html
>>
>>
>> And the test tool is compliant to this test test specification.
>> http://www.tahi.org/logo/release/Self_Test_1-5-0b1.tgz
>>
>> Disabling RH0 is not mandated at this moment, but it is selectable.
>> We may need some discussion on this.
>> Although, the public review is over, if you have some comments about
>> this, v6LC welcome your comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ....miyata
>>
>> On 2008/01/02, at 12:22, sghosh@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Self Test 1.5.0-b2 (beta)
>>> Includes the some of the bits to see if Type0 should be supported or
>>> not.
>>> See config.txt in the testsuite. RFC5095 was just published on
>>> Standards Track
>>> deprecating RH0 and specifying the required behavior. ICMP Parameter
>>> Problem is
>>> now required. The testsuite could not be changed until the RFC was
>>> published.
>>>
>>> The original fix for the CVE in some distributions like RHEL was to
>>> silently
>>> drop the packet. That behavior needs to be updated.
>>>
>>> -regards
>>> Subhendu Ghosh
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Who knows? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Gui Jianfeng 写道:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> IPV6 routing header with type 0 doesn't support by latest linux
>>>>> kernel any more,
>>>>> but some of the IPV6 ct test cases are still based on routing
>>>>> header of type 0.
>>>>> I'd like to know, whether this kind of test cases will be removed
>>>>> or updated?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> Gui Jianfeng
>>>> Development Dept.I
>>>> Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
>>>> 8/F., Civil Defense Building, No.189 Guangzhou Road,
>>>> Nanjing, 210029, China
>>>> TEL: +86+25-86630566-838
>>>> COINS: 79955-838
>>>> FAX: +86+25-83317685
>>>> MAIL:guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>