On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:56:30AM -0700, Yinghui Yao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone please give me an answer for this?
>
Which kernel do you use and which test do fail ?
Afaik here was a wrong securety fix in some kernel versions which
did disable RH0 handling completely, instead to send correct ICMP
messages.
> Thanks,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
>
> Yinghui Yao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let's not talk about the beta program. I need to pass Self_Test_1_4_9
> > and now our NUT is dropping the RH0 packet. Is that acceptable in your
> > evaluation process or we have to modify our program to pass "100%" of
> > your tests.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yinghui Yao
> > Alcatel-Lucent
> >
> > Hiroshi MIYATA wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> You know IPv6 Logo Program is planing to update the IPv6 core test
> >> specification.
> >> It was under public review.(until 3rd, Jan.)
> >> And RH0 is covered in the latest version under public review.
> >> Please visit here.
> >> http://www.ipv6ready.org/announcement/public_review20071204_p2core.html
> >>
> >>
> >> And the test tool is compliant to this test test specification.
> >> http://www.tahi.org/logo/release/Self_Test_1-5-0b1.tgz
> >>
> >> Disabling RH0 is not mandated at this moment, but it is selectable.
> >> We may need some discussion on this.
> >> Although, the public review is over, if you have some comments about
> >> this, v6LC welcome your comments.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ....miyata
> >>
> >> On 2008/01/02, at 12:22, sghosh@redhat.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Self Test 1.5.0-b2 (beta)
> >>> Includes the some of the bits to see if Type0 should be supported or
> >>> not.
> >>> See config.txt in the testsuite. RFC5095 was just published on
> >>> Standards Track
> >>> deprecating RH0 and specifying the required behavior. ICMP Parameter
> >>> Problem is
> >>> now required. The testsuite could not be changed until the RFC was
> >>> published.
> >>>
> >>> The original fix for the CVE in some distributions like RHEL was to
> >>> silently
> >>> drop the packet. That behavior needs to be updated.
> >>>
> >>> -regards
> >>> Subhendu Ghosh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Who knows? :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Gui Jianfeng 蜀咎％:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>> IPV6 routing header with type 0 doesn't support by latest linux
> >>>>> kernel any more,
> >>>>> but some of the IPV6 ct test cases are still based on routing
> >>>>> header of type 0.
> >>>>> I'd like to know, whether this kind of test cases will be removed
> >>>>> or updated?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Gui Jianfeng
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Gui Jianfeng
> >>>> --------------------------------------------------
> >>>> Gui Jianfeng
> >>>> Development Dept.I
> >>>> Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
> >>>> 8/F., Civil Defense Building, No.189 Guangzhou Road,
> >>>> Nanjing, 210029, China
> >>>> TEL: +86+25-86630566-838
> >>>> COINS: 79955-838
> >>>> FAX: +86+25-83317685
> >>>> MAIL:guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com
> >>>> --------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Karsten Keil
SuSE Labs
ISDN and VOIP development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr.5 90409 Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)