Thanks Yukiyo. When and which version of the software will be updated?
Regards,
Yinghui Yao
Alcatel-Lucent
Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> Hi, Yao.
>
> The cleanup procedure will be updated.
>
> Because some of current cleanup procedures is not same as the specification.
> We must follow the specification.
>
> Actual specification will take the following.
>
> TN NUT
> | |
> |---> | unsolicited NA (multicast, S=0&O=1, different TLL)
> | |
> |------>| Echo Request
> |<------| Echo Reply
> | |
> * | Wait (DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME)
> | |
> |<------| NS (unicast)
> |<------| NS (unicast)
> |<------| NS (unicast)
> | |
> V V
>
> It will work for everything.
>
> // Personally, I wanted to consider NA is sending a packet.
> // But, specification accepts both. :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:03:24 -0700
> Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone especially TAHI guys ever questioned wisdom behind the
>> sequence that TAHI clears NUT's ND entry
>>
>> TN NUT
>> | |
>> | ----> | NS (unicast) (different cached address)
>> | <---- | NA
>> | |
>> * | Wait (DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME)
>> | |
>> | <---- | NS (unicast)
>> | <---- | NS (unicast)
>> | <---- | NS (unicast)
>> | |
>> V V
>>
>> I understand it's based on RFC 2461 section 7.3.3
>>
>> "The first time a node sends a packet to a neighbor whose entry is
>> STALE, the sender changes the state to DELAY and a sets a timer to
>> expire in DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME seconds."
>>
>> Does "NA packet sent from NUT" count as "sending a packet". I would
>> think "sending a packet"
>> really means sending packets other than ND e.g. ICMP, TCP/UDP packets.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yinghui Yao
>> Alcatel-Lucent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
>