Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:58:31 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00515] Re: ND cleanup in Self_Test_1_4_9
To: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080130085831.029d2ee3.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <479F4F2D.1000608@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <479E6D4C.9070604@alcatel-lucent.com>	<20080129095222.dc3caf16.akisada@tahi.org>	<479F4F2D.1000608@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00515

Hi, Yao.

It is still under debuging.

This modification will be released as minor revision up.
So, it will released as bug fix of v1.4.9.
The version will be v1.4.10.

It doesn't take a long time.
I hope that everything can be done in one week.

Please wait for a while.

Regards,


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:07:09 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Thanks Yukiyo. When and which version of the software will be updated?
> 
> Regards,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 
> Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> > Hi, Yao.
> >
> > The cleanup procedure will be updated.
> >
> > Because some of current cleanup procedures is not same as the specification.
> > We must follow the specification.
> >
> > Actual specification will take the following.
> >
> >    TN     NUT
> >    |       |
> >    |--->   | unsolicited NA (multicast, S=0&O=1, different TLL)
> >    |       |
> >    |------>| Echo Request
> >    |<------| Echo Reply
> >    |       |
> >    *       | Wait (DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME)
> >    |       |
> >    |<------| NS (unicast)
> >    |<------| NS (unicast)
> >    |<------| NS (unicast)
> >    |       |
> >    V       V
> >
> > It will work for everything.
> >
> > // Personally, I wanted to consider NA is sending a packet.
> > // But, specification accepts both. :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:03:24 -0700
> > Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone especially TAHI guys ever questioned wisdom behind the 
> >> sequence that TAHI clears NUT's ND entry
> >>
> >>    TN     NUT
> >>    |       |
> >>    | ----> | NS (unicast) (different cached address)
> >>    | <---- | NA
> >>    |       |
> >>    *       | Wait (DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME)
> >>    |       |
> >>    | <---- | NS (unicast)
> >>    | <---- | NS (unicast)
> >>    | <---- | NS (unicast)
> >>    |       |
> >>    V       V
> >>
> >> I understand it's based on RFC 2461 section 7.3.3
> >>  
> >> "The first time a node sends a packet to a neighbor whose entry is
> >>   STALE, the sender changes the state to DELAY and a sets a timer to
> >>   expire in DELAY_FIRST_PROBE_TIME seconds."
> >>
> >> Does "NA packet sent from NUT" count as "sending a packet". I would 
> >> think "sending a packet"
> >> really means sending packets other than ND e.g. ICMP, TCP/UDP packets.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Yinghui Yao
> >> Alcatel-Lucent
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> >   
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>