Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0600 From: Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> Subject: [users:00519] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements To: users@tahi.org Message-Id: <OF86A0368F.80E44593-ON862573E0.004D37E6-862573E0.004DD620@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20080130090826.043c47d2.akisada@tahi.org> X-Mail-Count: 00519Thanks for answering the first question. However, for #2 I want to know what I should name the files themselves. I didn't find that in the document you sent me. Someone else sent me the tarball of RedHat's results so I can look at those to see what they did - but I still want to know if naming conventions are online somewhere. For example, see this old document, section 0.2: http://www.tahi.org/ume/IPv6Ready_P1_interop_1-3-3.pdf Or - does it not matter what I name things as long as someone can figure out what I did? Thanks again, Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> 01/29/2008 06:08 PM Please respond to users@tahi.org To Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS cc users@tahi.org Subject [users:00517] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements Hi, Christy. For 1), you can use anything for "references". The examinor doesn't care about "references". The importance is that every "targets" are from different vendor. For example of 1.6.D, the combination will like following when counterpart devices chosen by you are from vendor A and vendor B. test with vendor A) TAR-Router 1 = your vendor REF-Router 3 = vendor X REF-Router 4 = vendor X TAR-Router 2 = vendor A test with vendor B) TAR-Router 1 = your vendor REF-Router 3 = vendor X REF-Router 4 = vendor X TAR-Router 2 = vendor B For 2), "Test interoperability specification appendix" is it. You can download from <http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html>. The current appendix is < http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>. Regards, On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0600 Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I have two more questions regarding the Phase 2 tests. > > 1) I understand that I have to run the tests with two hosts and two > routers from different vendors (for a total of four different vendors). > For test 1.6.D a third "reference" router is required. Can this router, > since it is purely for reference purposes, be from the same vendor as one > of the other routers? > 2) Is there a document that outlines required data, file name syntax, etc. > for these tests? I may be overlooking it but cannot find it on-line. > > Thank you, > > Christy > > ----- Forwarded by Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM on 01/29/2008 02:44 PM > ----- > > > > > > > Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to state that > that is required. > > > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > 01/22/2008 05:44 PM > > Please respond to > users@tahi.org > > > To > Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > cc > users@tahi.org > Subject > [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements > > > > > > > > > Hi, Christy. > > First of all, > are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols? > > If so, > you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1. > > Thanks, > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600 > Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need two vendors > > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C) only one > > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test twice, once > with > > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors' routers because > > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Christy > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>519_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)