<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks for answering the first question.
However, for #2 I want to know what I should name the files themselves.
I didn't find that in the document you sent me. Someone else sent me the
tarball of RedHat's results so I can look at those to see what they did
- but I still want to know if naming conventions are online somewhere.
For example, see this old document, section 0.2: http://www.tahi.org/ume/IPv6Ready_P1_interop_1-3-3.pdf</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Or - does it not matter what I name
things as long as someone can figure out what I did? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks again,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org></b>
</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/29/2008 06:08 PM</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
users@tahi.org</font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">users@tahi.org</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[users:00517] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability
Hardware Requirements</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi, Christy.<br>
<br>
For 1), you can use anything for "references".<br>
The examinor doesn't care about "references".<br>
The importance is that every "targets" are from different vendor.<br>
<br>
For example of 1.6.D,<br>
the combination will like following<br>
when counterpart devices chosen by you are from vendor A and vendor B.<br>
<br>
test with vendor A)<br>
TAR-Router 1 = your vendor<br>
REF-Router 3 = vendor X<br>
REF-Router 4 = vendor X<br>
TAR-Router 2 = vendor A<br>
test with vendor B)<br>
TAR-Router 1 = your vendor<br>
REF-Router 3 = vendor X<br>
REF-Router 4 = vendor X<br>
TAR-Router 2 = vendor B<br>
<br>
For 2),<br>
"Test interoperability specification appendix" is it.<br>
You can download from <http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html>.<br>
<br>
The current appendix is <http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0600<br>
Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I have two more questions regarding the Phase 2 tests.<br>
> <br>
> 1) I understand that I have to run the tests with two hosts
and two <br>
> routers from different vendors (for a total of four different vendors).
<br>
> For test 1.6.D a third "reference" router is required. Can
this router, <br>
> since it is purely for reference purposes, be from the same vendor
as one <br>
> of the other routers?<br>
> 2) Is there a document that outlines required data, file name syntax,
etc. <br>
> for these tests? I may be overlooking it but cannot find it on-line.<br>
> <br>
> Thank you,<br>
> <br>
> Christy<br>
> <br>
> ----- Forwarded by Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM on 01/29/2008 02:44
PM <br>
> -----<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to state
that <br>
> that is required. <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> <br>
> 01/22/2008 05:44 PM <br>
> <br>
> Please respond to<br>
> users@tahi.org<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> To<br>
> Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS <br>
> cc<br>
> users@tahi.org <br>
> Subject<br>
> [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Hi, Christy.<br>
> <br>
> First of all,<br>
> are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols?<br>
> <br>
> If so,<br>
> you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1.<br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> <br>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600<br>
> Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need two
vendors <br>
> > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C)
only one <br>
> > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test twice,
once <br>
> with <br>
> > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors' routers
because <br>
> > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers?<br>
> > <br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > <br>
> > Christy<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org><br>
> <br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org><br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br>