Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:09:45 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00524] Re: Fw:  Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements
To: Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080131180945.1e86f573.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF86A0368F.80E44593-ON862573E0.004D37E6-862573E0.004DD620@us.ibm.com>
References: <20080130090826.043c47d2.akisada@tahi.org>	<OF86A0368F.80E44593-ON862573E0.004D37E6-862573E0.004DD620@us.ibm.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00524

Hi, Christy.

I'm still misunderstanding you.
Isn't Section 1.2 of IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf what you want?

Thanks,


On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0600
Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thanks for answering the first question. However, for #2 I want to know 
> what I should name the files themselves. I didn't find that in the 
> document you sent me. Someone else sent me the tarball of RedHat's results 
> so I can look at those to see what they did - but I still want to know if 
> naming conventions are online somewhere. For example, see this old 
> document, section 0.2: 
> http://www.tahi.org/ume/IPv6Ready_P1_interop_1-3-3.pdf
> 
> Or - does it not matter what I name things as long as someone can figure 
> out what I did? 
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> 
> 01/29/2008 06:08 PM
> Please respond to
> users@tahi.org
> 
> 
> To
> Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> users@tahi.org
> Subject
> [users:00517] Re: Fw:  Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Christy.
> 
> For 1), you can use anything for "references".
> The examinor doesn't care about "references".
> The importance is that every "targets" are from different vendor.
> 
> For example of 1.6.D,
> the combination will like following
> when counterpart devices chosen by you are from vendor A and vendor B.
> 
>     test with vendor A)
>         TAR-Router 1 = your vendor
>         REF-Router 3 = vendor X
>         REF-Router 4 = vendor X
>         TAR-Router 2 = vendor A
>     test with vendor B)
>         TAR-Router 1 = your vendor
>         REF-Router 3 = vendor X
>         REF-Router 4 = vendor X
>         TAR-Router 2 = vendor B
> 
> For 2),
> "Test interoperability specification appendix" is it.
> You can download from <http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html>.
> 
> The current appendix is <
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0600
> Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have two more questions regarding the Phase 2 tests.
> > 
> > 1)  I understand that I have to run the tests with two hosts and two 
> > routers from different vendors (for a total of four different vendors). 
> > For test 1.6.D a third "reference" router is required.  Can this router, 
> 
> > since it is purely for reference purposes, be from the same vendor as 
> one 
> > of the other routers?
> > 2) Is there a document that outlines required data, file name syntax, 
> etc. 
> > for these tests? I may be overlooking it but cannot find it on-line.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > Christy
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded by Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM on 01/29/2008 02:44 PM 
> 
> > -----
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to state that 
> > that is required. 
> > 
> > 
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> 
> > 01/22/2008 05:44 PM 
> > 
> > Please respond to
> > users@tahi.org
> > 
> > 
> > To
> > Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS 
> > cc
> > users@tahi.org 
> > Subject
> > [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, Christy.
> > 
> > First of all,
> > are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols?
> > 
> > If so,
> > you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600
> > Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need two 
> vendors 
> > > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C) only one 
> 
> > > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test twice, once 
> > with 
> > > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors' routers 
> because 
> > > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Christy
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>