Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:05:26 -0600 From: Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> Subject: [users:00528] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements To: users@tahi.org Message-Id: <OFF38BF36A.76753301-ON862573E1.0057688A-862573E1.005863C3@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20080131180945.1e86f573.akisada@tahi.org> X-Mail-Count: 00528My apologies. I thought you were referring me back to this document (http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_8_4.pdf) but now I see that there is a seperate Apendix with the information I want. Thanks! Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> 01/31/2008 03:09 AM To Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS cc users@tahi.org Subject Re: [users:00519] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements Hi, Christy. I'm still misunderstanding you. Isn't Section 1.2 of IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf what you want? Thanks, On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0600 Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Thanks for answering the first question. However, for #2 I want to know > what I should name the files themselves. I didn't find that in the > document you sent me. Someone else sent me the tarball of RedHat's results > so I can look at those to see what they did - but I still want to know if > naming conventions are online somewhere. For example, see this old > document, section 0.2: > http://www.tahi.org/ume/IPv6Ready_P1_interop_1-3-3.pdf > > Or - does it not matter what I name things as long as someone can figure > out what I did? > > Thanks again, > > > > > > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > 01/29/2008 06:08 PM > Please respond to > users@tahi.org > > > To > Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > cc > users@tahi.org > Subject > [users:00517] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements > > > > > > > Hi, Christy. > > For 1), you can use anything for "references". > The examinor doesn't care about "references". > The importance is that every "targets" are from different vendor. > > For example of 1.6.D, > the combination will like following > when counterpart devices chosen by you are from vendor A and vendor B. > > test with vendor A) > TAR-Router 1 = your vendor > REF-Router 3 = vendor X > REF-Router 4 = vendor X > TAR-Router 2 = vendor A > test with vendor B) > TAR-Router 1 = your vendor > REF-Router 3 = vendor X > REF-Router 4 = vendor X > TAR-Router 2 = vendor B > > For 2), > "Test interoperability specification appendix" is it. > You can download from <http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html>. > > The current appendix is < > http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>. > > > Regards, > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0600 > Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I have two more questions regarding the Phase 2 tests. > > > > 1) I understand that I have to run the tests with two hosts and two > > routers from different vendors (for a total of four different vendors). > > For test 1.6.D a third "reference" router is required. Can this router, > > > since it is purely for reference purposes, be from the same vendor as > one > > of the other routers? > > 2) Is there a document that outlines required data, file name syntax, > etc. > > for these tests? I may be overlooking it but cannot find it on-line. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Christy > > > > ----- Forwarded by Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM on 01/29/2008 02:44 PM > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to state that > > that is required. > > > > > > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > > 01/22/2008 05:44 PM > > > > Please respond to > > users@tahi.org > > > > > > To > > Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > cc > > users@tahi.org > > Subject > > [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Christy. > > > > First of all, > > are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols? > > > > If so, > > you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1. > > > > Thanks, > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600 > > Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need two > vendors > > > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C) only one > > > > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test twice, once > > with > > > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors' routers > because > > > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Christy > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>528_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)