<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My apologies. I thought you were referring
me back to this document (http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_8_4.pdf)
but now I see that there is a seperate Apendix with the information I want.
Thanks!</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org></b>
</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/31/2008 03:09 AM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">users@tahi.org</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [users:00519] Re: Fw: Re:
Interoperability Hardware Requirements</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi, Christy.<br>
<br>
I'm still misunderstanding you.<br>
Isn't Section 1.2 of IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf what you want?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0600<br>
Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thanks for answering the first question. However, for #2 I want to
know <br>
> what I should name the files themselves. I didn't find that in the
<br>
> document you sent me. Someone else sent me the tarball of RedHat's
results <br>
> so I can look at those to see what they did - but I still want to
know if <br>
> naming conventions are online somewhere. For example, see this old
<br>
> document, section 0.2: <br>
> http://www.tahi.org/ume/IPv6Ready_P1_interop_1-3-3.pdf<br>
> <br>
> Or - does it not matter what I name things as long as someone can
figure <br>
> out what I did? <br>
> <br>
> Thanks again,<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> <br>
> 01/29/2008 06:08 PM<br>
> Please respond to<br>
> users@tahi.org<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> To<br>
> Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS<br>
> cc<br>
> users@tahi.org<br>
> Subject<br>
> [users:00517] Re: Fw: Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Hi, Christy.<br>
> <br>
> For 1), you can use anything for "references".<br>
> The examinor doesn't care about "references".<br>
> The importance is that every "targets" are from different
vendor.<br>
> <br>
> For example of 1.6.D,<br>
> the combination will like following<br>
> when counterpart devices chosen by you are from vendor A and vendor
B.<br>
> <br>
> test with vendor A)<br>
> TAR-Router 1 = your vendor<br>
> REF-Router 3 = vendor X<br>
> REF-Router 4 = vendor X<br>
> TAR-Router 2 = vendor A<br>
> test with vendor B)<br>
> TAR-Router 1 = your vendor<br>
> REF-Router 3 = vendor X<br>
> REF-Router 4 = vendor X<br>
> TAR-Router 2 = vendor B<br>
> <br>
> For 2),<br>
> "Test interoperability specification appendix" is it.<br>
> You can download from <http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase2_test.html>.<br>
> <br>
> The current appendix is <<br>
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Regards,<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0600<br>
> Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > I have two more questions regarding the Phase 2 tests.<br>
> > <br>
> > 1) I understand that I have to run the tests with two hosts
and two <br>
> > routers from different vendors (for a total of four different
vendors). <br>
> > For test 1.6.D a third "reference" router is required.
Can this router, <br>
> <br>
> > since it is purely for reference purposes, be from the same vendor
as <br>
> one <br>
> > of the other routers?<br>
> > 2) Is there a document that outlines required data, file name
syntax, <br>
> etc. <br>
> > for these tests? I may be overlooking it but cannot find it on-line.<br>
> > <br>
> > Thank you,<br>
> > <br>
> > Christy<br>
> > <br>
> > ----- Forwarded by Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM on 01/29/2008
02:44 PM <br>
> <br>
> > -----<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > Yes I am. Thanks. It might be good to update the document to
state that <br>
> > that is required. <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> <br>
> > 01/22/2008 05:44 PM <br>
> > <br>
> > Please respond to<br>
> > users@tahi.org<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > To<br>
> > Christy L Norman/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS <br>
> > cc<br>
> > users@tahi.org <br>
> > Subject<br>
> > [users:00478] Re: Interoperability Hardware Requirements<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > Hi, Christy.<br>
> > <br>
> > First of all,<br>
> > are you talking about IPv6Ready Logo Phase-2 Core Protocols?<br>
> > <br>
> > If so,<br>
> > you need to run the test twice with switching TAR-Router1.<br>
> > <br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > <br>
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:16:20 -0600<br>
> > Christy L Norman <cnorman@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br>
> > <br>
> > > When performing tests for the Interoperability part, I need
two <br>
> vendors <br>
> > > for each Router and Host nodes. In the tests (such as 1.1A-C)
only one <br>
> <br>
> > > router is pictured. Does this mean I need to run the test
twice, once <br>
> > with <br>
> > > each router? Or is the requirement to have two vendors'
routers <br>
> because <br>
> > > other tests (such as 1.5) require two routers?<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Thanks,<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Christy<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org><br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org><br>
</font></tt>
<br>