Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:26:40 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00539] Re: Interop 1.2 part D
To: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080204162640.90c22ec5.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <47A265BA.1000000@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <47A265BA.1000000@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00539

Hi, Yao.

Please see "Possible Problems" at the bottom of Test IP6Interop.1.2.

The solution of your case is described.
Using global address is one of solutions.
Configuring counterpart node's link-local is also the solution.

Thanks,


On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:20:10 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Hi Tahi Guys,
> 
> Part D 28 requires assigning link local address on TAR-router. Our 
> router can only create link local using EUI-64, but our global unicast 
> address can be assigned any value. Is it an RFC requirement that a 
> device should support manual configuration of link-local addresses? Can 
> we pass the test by using global unicast address?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>