Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:01:22 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00553] Re: IPv6 Conformance Test Program Package vs. Self Test files
To: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080206090122.7ba53c0c.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <47A8B2DD.5090206@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <47A8B2DD.5090206@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00553

Hi, Yao.

ct-2.1.1 is obsoleted one.

Before starting IPv6 Ready Logo Program,
we are developping everything in ct-X.X.X.

After starting the program,
we released Self_Test_X-X-X as phase1 and phase2 (core).
We also released other category based on the program.

So they don't have any technical relationship now.
There is just historical relationship.

When you get the logo, you must use Self_Test_1-4-9.

But ct-2.1.1 includes other protocol testers than the program coverage.
They are NAT-PT, Prefix Delegation, and so on.
It is still useful for developers. 

Thanks,


On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:02:53 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Hi Yukiyo,
> 
> Is IPv6 Conformance Test program package simply the collection of all 
> the Self_Tests for IPv6 core, IPsec ....? What the relationship between 
> their versions, for example ct-2.1.1.tar.gz vs. Self_Test_1_4_9.tgz?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>