Hi, Yao.
I don't prefer anything.
It depends on your situation.
In this moment, there is the tradeoff
between cost and reducing mistakes when you re-run the test.
Anyway, Akisada is my last name. :-)
Thanks,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:30:55 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Hi Akisada-san,
>
> Does this mean "manual testing" is a preferred way for interoperability
> at this time? (Is Akisada your last name?)
>
> Thanks,
> Yao
>
> Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> > Hi, Inoue-san.
> >
> > I'm sorry for having kept you waiting.
> >
> > vel-1.0.4 doesn't support test scenario v2.8.4.
> > I mean supported version is older.
> >
> > In this moment,
> > you must modify *.sc files if you use vel to obtain the logo.
> >
> > Updating vel still has been in our queue for developping,
> > but the next release may take several months.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:39:22 +0900
> > inoue yu-ichi <yu-inoue@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> We want to use vel(TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test Suite) to get phase2.
> >>
> >> But vel README is
> >> ---
> >> - example/interop_ph2_core/
> >> Directory interop_ph2_core includes Interoperability test
> >> scenario maker. It supports Phase-2 Test Interoperability
> >> Specification Core Protocols version 2.8.0.
> >> ---
> >>
> >> latest interoperability specification revision is 2.8.4.
> >> vel support version is older than latest.
> >>
> >> Can We use vel to get phase2?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> inoue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>