Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:03 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00569] Re: Interop 1.6
To: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080207151803.fb9d68c0.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <47AA1EEA.8000008@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <47AA1EEA.8000008@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00569

Hi, Yao.

Please refer to "Possible Problems:" section.
You can see it at the bottom of Test IP6Interop.1.6.

You can test it with additional configuration.

Thanks,


On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:10 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Hi Akisada-san,
> 
> As I mentioned before, our router doesn't care about MTU since we do 
> hardware routing and the hardware doesn't have per vlan MTU concept. I 
> was able to pass all Self_Test1.4.9 tests by disabling MTU option in 
> config.txt. However, Iterop 1.6 is all about path MTU discovery and 
> fragmentation again. If we don't claim we support the "advanced" feature 
> - MTU configuration, do we still have to test Interop 1.6?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yinghui Yao
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>